Difference between revisions of "Talk:Atheistic science"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Black holes are an implausible fiction of atheistic science. They help sell atheistic pseudo-scientific magazines to the public. They are contrary to quantum mechanics and are one of the Counterexamples to Relativity.)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
First, what are "non-materialistic phenomena"? Second, black holes most certainly exist. Cygnus X-1 and Sagittarius A* are examples. [[User:QuantumDude|QuantumDude]] ([[User talk:QuantumDude|talk]]) 00:16, 8 February 2016 (EST)
 
First, what are "non-materialistic phenomena"? Second, black holes most certainly exist. Cygnus X-1 and Sagittarius A* are examples. [[User:QuantumDude|QuantumDude]] ([[User talk:QuantumDude|talk]]) 00:16, 8 February 2016 (EST)
 +
 +
:Black holes are an implausible fiction of atheistic science.  They help sell atheistic pseudo-scientific magazines to the public.  They are contrary to [[quantum mechanics]] and are one of the [[Counterexamples to Relativity]].--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 10:00, 8 February 2016 (EST)

Revision as of 15:00, February 8, 2016

First, what are "non-materialistic phenomena"? Second, black holes most certainly exist. Cygnus X-1 and Sagittarius A* are examples. QuantumDude (talk) 00:16, 8 February 2016 (EST)

Black holes are an implausible fiction of atheistic science. They help sell atheistic pseudo-scientific magazines to the public. They are contrary to quantum mechanics and are one of the Counterexamples to Relativity.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 10:00, 8 February 2016 (EST)