Difference between revisions of "Betteridge's law of headlines"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(readd target example)
(+ possible example Bernie Sanders)
Line 36: Line 36:
 
*[http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-35066940 "Is Donald Trump a Democratic secret agent?"]
 
*[http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-35066940 "Is Donald Trump a Democratic secret agent?"]
 
*[http://consumerist.com/2014/01/23/is-target-shaving-workers-hours-so-it-doesnt-have-to-insure-them/ "Is Target Shaving Workers’ Hours So It Doesn’t Have To Insure Them?"]
 
*[http://consumerist.com/2014/01/23/is-target-shaving-workers-hours-so-it-doesnt-have-to-insure-them/ "Is Target Shaving Workers’ Hours So It Doesn’t Have To Insure Them?"]
−
 
+
*[http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/02/09/is-there-a-libertarian-case-for-bernie-sanders.html "Is There a Libertarian Case for Bernie Sanders?"]
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
{{Reflist}}
 
{{Reflist}}
  
 
[[Category:Journalism]]
 
[[Category:Journalism]]

Revision as of 19:56, February 9, 2016

Betteridge's law of headlines states that headlines that end with a question mark can be safely answered "no".[1]

Possible examples

References