Difference between revisions of "John E. Jones III"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
'''John E. Jones III''' is a [[Republican]] judge  from [[Pennsylvania]]. He was appointed by President [[George W. Bush]] and has presided over many cases. One such case, the [[Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District]], was brought by the parents of 11 students from the Dover school district to remove [[Intelligent Design]] from district classrooms. Jones ruled that it should be removed, and this has sparked a controversy.
 
'''John E. Jones III''' is a [[Republican]] judge  from [[Pennsylvania]]. He was appointed by President [[George W. Bush]] and has presided over many cases. One such case, the [[Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District]], was brought by the parents of 11 students from the Dover school district to remove [[Intelligent Design]] from district classrooms. Jones ruled that it should be removed, and this has sparked a controversy.
  
−
Jones accused the pro-intelligent design School Board in the ''Kitzmiller'' case of [[deceit|deceitful]] tactics, but of course this was his opinion, and not prosecuted.<ref> "n7 ... In fact, one consistency among the Dover School Board members' testimony, which was marked by selective memories and outright lies under oath, as will be discussed in more detail below, is that they did not think they needed to be knowledgeable about ID because it was not being taught to the students. We disagree." Judge John E. Jones III, Republican, in Kitzmiller v. Dover Independent School District, 400 F. Supp. 2d 707, 727.</ref>  Legal scholars Jay D. Wexler and Arnold H. Loewy questioned Judge Jones's ruling. <ref>http://www.evolutionnews.org/2007/03/kitzmiller_attorney_uses_harsh.html</ref> Also, the WorldNetDaily stated: "A historic judicial ruling against intelligent design theory hailed as a "broad, stinging rebuke" and a "masterpiece of wit, scholarship and clear thinking" actually had material in its "finding of facts" that was "cut and pasted" from a brief by [[ACLU]] lawyers and includes many of their provable errors, contends the Seattle-based Discovery Institute." <ref>http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53330</ref><ref>http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=3829</ref><ref>http://www.evolutionnews.org/2007/01/a_response_to_darwinist_defend.html</ref>  The Discovery Institute states that Judge Jones follwed the ACLU and ignored contrary facts. <ref>http://www.evolutionnews.org/2005/12/judge_jones_follows_aclu_ignor.html</ref>
+
Jones accused the pro-intelligent design School Board in the ''Kitzmiller'' case of [[deceit|deceitful]] tactics, but of course this was his opinion, and not prosecuted.<ref> "n7 ... In fact, one consistency among the Dover School Board members' testimony, which was marked by selective memories and outright lies under oath, as will be discussed in more detail below, is that they did not think they needed to be knowledgeable about ID because it was not being taught to the students. We disagree." Judge John E. Jones III, Republican, in Kitzmiller v. Dover Independent School District, 400 F. Supp. 2d 707, 727.</ref>  Legal scholars Jay D. Wexler and Arnold H. Loewy questioned Judge Jones's ruling. <ref>http://www.evolutionnews.org/2007/03/kitzmiller_attorney_uses_harsh.html</ref> Also, the WorldNetDaily stated: "A historic judicial ruling against intelligent design theory hailed as a "broad, stinging rebuke" and a "masterpiece of wit, scholarship and clear thinking" actually had material in its "finding of facts" that was "cut and pasted" from a brief by [[ACLU]] lawyers and includes many of their provable errors, contends the Seattle-based Discovery Institute." <ref>http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53330</ref><ref>http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=3829</ref><ref>http://www.evolutionnews.org/2007/01/a_response_to_darwinist_defend.html</ref>  The Discovery Institute states that Judge Jones followed the ACLU and ignored contrary facts. <ref>http://www.evolutionnews.org/2005/12/judge_jones_follows_aclu_ignor.html</ref>
 
Information published by the [[Discovery Institute]] is contested.<ref>For a rebuttal argument, see [http://www.talkorigins.org/origins/postmonth/jan06.html#part2 here]</ref>
 
Information published by the [[Discovery Institute]] is contested.<ref>For a rebuttal argument, see [http://www.talkorigins.org/origins/postmonth/jan06.html#part2 here]</ref>
  

Revision as of 06:49, April 21, 2007

John E. Jones III is a Republican judge from Pennsylvania. He was appointed by President George W. Bush and has presided over many cases. One such case, the Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, was brought by the parents of 11 students from the Dover school district to remove Intelligent Design from district classrooms. Jones ruled that it should be removed, and this has sparked a controversy.

Jones accused the pro-intelligent design School Board in the Kitzmiller case of deceitful tactics, but of course this was his opinion, and not prosecuted.[1] Legal scholars Jay D. Wexler and Arnold H. Loewy questioned Judge Jones's ruling. [2] Also, the WorldNetDaily stated: "A historic judicial ruling against intelligent design theory hailed as a "broad, stinging rebuke" and a "masterpiece of wit, scholarship and clear thinking" actually had material in its "finding of facts" that was "cut and pasted" from a brief by ACLU lawyers and includes many of their provable errors, contends the Seattle-based Discovery Institute." [3][4][5] The Discovery Institute states that Judge Jones followed the ACLU and ignored contrary facts. [6] Information published by the Discovery Institute is contested.[7]

After the trial, Judge Jones signed an order that prohibited any appeal of his decision and awarded over $2 million in legal fees to the ACLU's side.

Discovery Institute States that Judge E. Jones III Appears to Have Committed Plagiarism

The Discovery Institute wrote that Judge Jones appears to have plagiarized a scholar's book in his Dickinson College commencement speech and gives a comparison of the speech and the scholar's work. [8]

References

  1. ↑ "n7 ... In fact, one consistency among the Dover School Board members' testimony, which was marked by selective memories and outright lies under oath, as will be discussed in more detail below, is that they did not think they needed to be knowledgeable about ID because it was not being taught to the students. We disagree." Judge John E. Jones III, Republican, in Kitzmiller v. Dover Independent School District, 400 F. Supp. 2d 707, 727.
  2. ↑ http://www.evolutionnews.org/2007/03/kitzmiller_attorney_uses_harsh.html
  3. ↑ http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53330
  4. ↑ http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=3829
  5. ↑ http://www.evolutionnews.org/2007/01/a_response_to_darwinist_defend.html
  6. ↑ http://www.evolutionnews.org/2005/12/judge_jones_follows_aclu_ignor.html
  7. ↑ For a rebuttal argument, see here
  8. ↑ http://www.evolutionnews.org/2006/12/did_judge_jones_plagiarize_sch.html
Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=John_E._Jones_III&oldid=120142"