Talk:Essay: Dawkins is conquered and muzzled by women

You wrote "Meanwhile, secular Europe is seeing a flood of religious immigrants". It's true, they are, and this is what they do.[1].--JamieVa (talk) 08:40, 22 March 2016 (EDT)

Those in ISIS are not truly religious people as they preach hate, and don't adhere to christian values. Your argument is flawed. TerryW (talk) 08:48, 22 March 2016 (EDT)

great article by the way!

When told that Red Army soldiers sexually assaulted German refugees, the atheist Joseph Stalin reportedly declared: "We lecture our soldiers too much; let them have their initiative." See: Mass rape of German women by the Soviet army

Jesus was crucified due to religious people. And technically speaking, atheism is a religion and historically it is responsible for more untimely deaths than Islam (see: Atheism and mass murder).

I know Muslims have been raping non-Muslim women in Europe, but on the domestic violence front and rape front, irreligion does not have a great record (see: Irreligion and domestic violence and Atheism and rape and Mass rape of German women by the Soviet army). "

A primary reason why irreligious and politically left of center European countries are bringing Muslims into their countries is due to the sub-replacement level of births. Employers need workers (I am guessing this is partly the reason why Germany has so many immigrants). Another is that new immigrants generally vote for leftists. See: Desecularization.

Europe is on the decline and they need to make some changes. I hope to see a resurgence of Christianity in Europe. Conservative (talk) 11:35, 22 March 2016 (EDT)

I had my doubts that Angela Merkel was taking in a lot of immigrants for humanitarian reasons. I think this article confirms my suspicions: There's a very practical reason why Germany is taking in so many refugees. Conservative (talk) 11:44, 22 March 2016 (EDT)

Anyways, New Atheism is on its last legs. And I think the public mood and the mood within atheism is for there to be less friction between the irreligious and religious and not more. Post-Elevatorgate and Hitchen's death, the atheist movement has a lot of dissension within it and is it more docile in terms of their interaction with the religious (see: Decline of New Atheism).

New Atheism is on its last legs and is almost dead. And with an abrasive pantywaist like Dawkins and a clown like David Silverman (who resides in a religious country) being the leading spokesmen of New Atheism, I don't think things are going to turn around. I call Dawkins an abrasive pantywaist because like many intolerant bullies, he will back down when "punched in the nose" (I am speaking figuratively of course).

It is rather humorous that the supposed alpha male (One of his donors called Dawkins "Darwin's Rottweiler") and bully boy Dawkins was trounced and made more docile by feminists. I always suspected that Dawkins had a glass jaw and he would be turned into a whimpering bowl of jelly when faced with enough opposition. William Lane Craig showed Dawkins to be a coward. And given the public statement of Oxford atheist Daniel Came, I think even he thinks Dawkins is a coward (see: Atheism and cowardice).

I think movements that want to change society need both diplomats and firebrands. The atheist movement seems to have lost its most effective firebrands due to death (Christopher Hitchens) or missteps (Daawkins and PZ Myers). A lot of people within the atheist population have soured on Dawkins/Myers. Conservative (talk) 12:02, 22 March 2016 (EDT)