Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,756
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1,730:
Line 1,730: + + +
Conservapedia:Community Portal (view source)
Revision as of 06:25, April 4, 2016
, 06:25, April 4, 2016→We need to put a complete and permanent stop to this
::If he returns, which I don't think will happen, he would have to agree to: not create big "see also" sections, avoid using a lot of red internal links, only use highly relevant category tags. use hierarchical form of category tags and use an encyclopedic tone in his editing (avoid using the term "gun grabbing" often, etc. etc.). I think this is a moot point since I don't believe he is ever coming back to be an editor. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:56, 2 April 2016 (EDT)
::If he returns, which I don't think will happen, he would have to agree to: not create big "see also" sections, avoid using a lot of red internal links, only use highly relevant category tags. use hierarchical form of category tags and use an encyclopedic tone in his editing (avoid using the term "gun grabbing" often, etc. etc.). I think this is a moot point since I don't believe he is ever coming back to be an editor. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:56, 2 April 2016 (EDT)
I complained about TAR too much. If he wasn't for TAR, I wouldn't have rethought about how the [[Austrian school of economics]] have better predicted recessions/depressions and how many of these economists/financial experts are predicting an upcoming economic collapse.
Yes, his content could have been written/formatted much better. But I think I am looking a gift horse in the mouth. Sometimes a timely messenger comes wearing camel hair and a leather belt instead of wearing a three piece suit. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 02:14, 4 April 2016 (EDT)