Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, oversight, protect, ratelimit-exempt, rollback, Administrators
20,387
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1,830:
Line 1,830: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Conservapedia:Community Portal (view source)
Revision as of 18:40, April 14, 2016
, 18:40, April 14, 2016→Yet more on the repeated 500 errors: new section
::SamHB, you did an excellent job of setting up a strawman argument and then knocking it down. My apologies for not mentioning in the article that the atheists you know are not cannibals (as far as you know). Anytime you want to refute the [[Atheism and cannibalism]] article, let me know. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:06, 14 April 2016 (EDT)
::SamHB, you did an excellent job of setting up a strawman argument and then knocking it down. My apologies for not mentioning in the article that the atheists you know are not cannibals (as far as you know). Anytime you want to refute the [[Atheism and cannibalism]] article, let me know. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:06, 14 April 2016 (EDT)
== Yet more on the repeated 500 errors ==
I know people have said things about this before, but such comments always seem to be ignored or minimalized. Every day or two, I get a "500" (Internal Server) error message. Sometimes the site is unavailable for up to an hour and a half before I can get on again. This is not:
*A network problem - I have seen this on at least four different networks, one of which is a high-end professional network.
*Browser problem - By definition, this is a code the server returns, but I've tried at least 6 different browsers, with at least 3 different core engines
*User problem - believe it or not, I do know what I'm doing
<br />
That said, I understand that 500 errors are by definition unknown problems. They are sent when the server knows that something bad happened, but has no idea what and couldn't even retrieve the usual error page to serve. In other words, 500 errors are a pain, especially when they come and go. Perhaps there is really nothing which can be done about this. I will say that I've seen this kind of problem before with lower-price web hosting. In my opinion, this is often the sourse of a 500 error, but I know there are many others as well. If this is the case, complaining to the service provider or changing providers may be the only way to resolve this.<br />
If this is an issue which everyone else does not really care about, then feel free to ignore this post entirely. However, I thought I would just try to show that this is indeed a problem. I know I would want to know if my public website was going down for one or more hours every couple days. Here are some "proof" images (although I know they ''could'' be faked) in case my word isn't enough.<br />
[http://community.archnet.us/conservapedia/500/2016-03-04-10.jpg March 4th, 2016 at about 10am]<br />
[http://community.archnet.us/conservapedia/500/2016-03-08-14.jpg March 8th, 2016 at about 2pm]<br />
[http://community.archnet.us/conservapedia/500/2016-03-10-14.jpg March 10th, 2016 at about 2pm]<br />
[http://community.archnet.us/conservapedia/500/2016-03-16-18.jpg March 16th, 2016 at about 5pm]<br />
[http://community.archnet.us/conservapedia/500/2016-03-18-08.jpg March 18th, 2016 at about 8am]<br />
[http://community.archnet.us/conservapedia/500/2016-03-30-15.jpg March 30th, 2016 at about 3pm]<br />
[http://community.archnet.us/conservapedia/500/2016-04-02-22.jpg April 2nd, 2016 at about 10pm]<br />
[http://community.archnet.us/conservapedia/500/2016-04-05-12.jpg April 5th, 2016 at about 12pm]<br />
[http://community.archnet.us/conservapedia/500/2016-04-08-09.jpg April 8th, 2016 at about 9am]<br />
[http://community.archnet.us/conservapedia/500/2016-04-08-09-threeBrowsers.jpg April 8th, 2016 at about 9am #2] - Three browsers shown when [[Internet Explorer|IE]] worked but no others did. This was the only time I know of when this happened, and is a bit of a discrepancy. <br />
[http://community.archnet.us/conservapedia/500/2016-04-11-11.jpg April 11th, 2016 at about 11am]<br />
[http://community.archnet.us/conservapedia/500/2016-04-14-9.jpg April 14th, 2016 at about 9am]<br />
Need I go on? Just to be clear, I am not posting this just to complain, but to try to be helpful. Have a great day! --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|talk]]) 14:40, 14 April 2016 (EDT)