Difference between revisions of "Corker law"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Votes by Cruz and Paul)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
(→‎References: Spell Check)
Line 17: Line 17:
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
  
−
[[category:politics]]
+
[[Category:Politics]]
−
[[category:government]]
+
[[Category:Government]]
−
[[category:United States Constitution]]
+
[[Category:United States Constitution]]

Revision as of 17:38, June 23, 2016

The Corker Law, officially known as Bipartisan Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act and informally still called the "Corker bill," is a misguided federal law that circumvents the Treaty Clause in the U.S. Constitution, and essentially requires not a 2/3rds vote to ratify a foreign treaty, but a 2/3rds vote to reject one (in order to override a presidential veto). In other words, the Corker law replaces the Treaty Clause with respect to Iran such that a majority vote in Congress can reject the deal, but the president can then reject the congressional vote, which would require a 2/3rds vote by each house of Congress to override the veto.

Only one senator voted against this law: Tom Cotton, who explains that it violates the Constitution. He explained:[1]

“ A nuclear-arms agreement with any adversary—especially the terror-sponsoring, Islamist Iranian regime—should be submitted as a treaty and obtain a two-thirds majority vote in the Senate as required by the Constitution. ”

Disappointingly, Senator's Ted Cruz and Rand Paul voted for the Corker bill.

Background

Senator Bob Corker, a RINO from Tennessee, introduced this bill as a compromise with respect to the proposed deal being negotiated by the Obama Administration with Iran.

Constitutionality

The U.S. Supreme Court has never addressed the constitutionality of this approach.

References