Difference between revisions of "Empirical science"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by TheAmericanRedoubt (talk) to last revision by AK)
(→‎References: clean up)
Line 32: Line 32:
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
 
{{Reflist}}  
 
{{Reflist}}  
−
[[category:science]]  
+
[[Category:Science]]  
−
[[category:scientific disciplines]]  
+
[[Category:Scientific disciplines]]  
−
[[category:Methodology of Science]]
+
[[Category:Methodology of Science]]

Revision as of 20:47, June 23, 2016

Empirical science is based on the scientific method that requires from the scientist to test a theory based on observed or predicted facts. The scientist must formulate a theory or a hypothesis based on what has been observed, then design a test by which the theory may be verified as valid or not.[1] Knowledge and data acquired in empirical science is based entirely on experience and repeatable observations. Modern science has empiricism as its philosophical foundation. If adherents of a theory or hypothesis continue believing it due to their worldview despite it cannot survive a confrontation with experience, then such attitude is usually referred to as faith in doctrinal commitment. For example, a faith in planned economy or in junk DNA have been proposed to fall into such category.[2][3]

See also

References

  1. ↑ Empirical Science Is Observable. the Institute for Creation Research.
  2. ↑ David Berlinski (2009). "Has Darwin met his match?", The Deniable Darwin. Seattle, USA: Discovery Institute Press (reprinted from Commentary February 1998 by permission), 308. ISBN 978-0-9790141-2-3. 
  3. ↑ Jonathan Wells (2011). The Myth of Junk DNA. Discovery Institute Press. ISBN 978-1-9365990-0-4.