Difference between revisions of "Evolution and science"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by RealScience (talk) to last revision by AugustO)
(Spelling/Grammar Check, typos fixed: incresingly → increasingly)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
'''Evolution and science''' conflict with each other. [[Evolution]] is clearly [[atheism|atheistic]],<ref>http://www.atheists.org/flash.line/atheism1.htm</ref> [[liberal]] pseudo or [[junk science]] which is easily disproven by the numerous [[Counterexamples to Evolution|counterexamples to evolution]] that exist. Evolution is also unscientific because it is based on a [[Counterexamples to an Old Earth|time frame]] which predates [[creation]].  
 
'''Evolution and science''' conflict with each other. [[Evolution]] is clearly [[atheism|atheistic]],<ref>http://www.atheists.org/flash.line/atheism1.htm</ref> [[liberal]] pseudo or [[junk science]] which is easily disproven by the numerous [[Counterexamples to Evolution|counterexamples to evolution]] that exist. Evolution is also unscientific because it is based on a [[Counterexamples to an Old Earth|time frame]] which predates [[creation]].  
  
Intelligent people who can distinguish real [[science]] from atheistic secular junk science are incresingly embracing the rigid [[logic]] of [[creation science]].
+
Intelligent people who can distinguish real [[science]] from atheistic secular junk science are increasingly embracing the rigid [[logic]] of [[creation science]].
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
[[Category:Science]]
 
[[Category:Science]]
[[Category: Evolution]]
+
[[Category:Evolution]]

Revision as of 14:39, June 24, 2016

Evolution and science conflict with each other. Evolution is clearly atheistic,[1] liberal pseudo or junk science which is easily disproven by the numerous counterexamples to evolution that exist. Evolution is also unscientific because it is based on a time frame which predates creation.

Intelligent people who can distinguish real science from atheistic secular junk science are increasingly embracing the rigid logic of creation science.

References