Difference between revisions of "Schlockumentary"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(clean up & uniformity)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
'''Schlockumentary''' is a term referring to [[documentary]] films that use [[junk science]], dishonest editing, and/or highly [[bias]]ed research methods intended to arrive at [[partisan]] or [[conspiracy|conspiratorial]] conclusions. <ref>[http://www.americanthinker.com/2006/12/michael_moore_issues_iraq_with.html Michael Moore Issues Iraq Withdrawal Fatwa], By Noel Sheppard, ''[[American Thinker]]'', December 04, 2006.</ref>
+
'''Schlockumentary''' is a term referring to [[documentary]] films that use [[junk science]], dishonest editing, and/or highly [[bias]]ed research methods intended to arrive at [[partisan]] or [[conspiracy|conspiratorial]] conclusions.<ref>[http://www.americanthinker.com/2006/12/michael_moore_issues_iraq_with.html Michael Moore Issues Iraq Withdrawal Fatwa], By Noel Sheppard, ''[[American Thinker]]'', December 04, 2006.</ref>
  
 
==Origins==
 
==Origins==
−
Schlockumentary is a [[portmanteau]] of the [[Yiddish]] word schlock -meaning junk-<ref>[http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,865066-2,00.html Block That Schlock], ''TIME magazine'', Nov. 23, 1959</ref>, with documentary. It is a favorite tactic of [[liberal deceit|liberals]] to disparage viewpoints with which they disagree. Filmmakers such as [[Michael Moore]] are notorious for their [[libel]]ous films which use faulty logic to advance their [[liberal agenda]] despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
+
Schlockumentary is a [[portmanteau]] of the [[Yiddish]] word schlock -meaning junk-,<ref>[http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,865066-2,00.html Block That Schlock], ''TIME magazine'', Nov. 23, 1959</ref> with documentary. It is a favorite tactic of [[liberal deceit|liberals]] to disparage viewpoints with which they disagree. Filmmakers such as [[Michael Moore]] are notorious for their [[libel]]ous films which use faulty logic to advance their [[liberal agenda]] despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
  
 
==Examples==
 
==Examples==
Line 16: Line 16:
 
*''[[Jesus Camp]]''
 
*''[[Jesus Camp]]''
 
*''[[Loose Change]]''
 
*''[[Loose Change]]''
−
*''[[Fox_News_Channel#Fair_and_Balanced|Outfoxed]]''
+
*''[[Fox News Channel#Fair and Balanced|Outfoxed]]''
 
*''[[Sicko]]''
 
*''[[Sicko]]''
 
*''[[Zeitgeist: The Movie]]''
 
*''[[Zeitgeist: The Movie]]''
  
 
==Examples used by the Left==
 
==Examples used by the Left==
−
[[liberal|Liberals]] often criticize the following conservative documentaries:
+
[[Liberal]]s often criticize the following conservative documentaries:
 
*''[[Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed]]''
 
*''[[Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed]]''
  
Line 28: Line 28:
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
  
−
==See Also==
+
==See also==
 
*[[Mockumentary]]
 
*[[Mockumentary]]
  
 
[[Category:Cinema]]
 
[[Category:Cinema]]
−
[[Category : Schlockumentary| ]]
+
[[Category:Schlockumentary| ]]
−
[[Category : Hollywood Values]]
+
[[Category:Hollywood Values]]

Revision as of 21:24, June 27, 2016

Schlockumentary is a term referring to documentary films that use junk science, dishonest editing, and/or highly biased research methods intended to arrive at partisan or conspiratorial conclusions.[1]

Origins

Schlockumentary is a portmanteau of the Yiddish word schlock -meaning junk-,[2] with documentary. It is a favorite tactic of liberals to disparage viewpoints with which they disagree. Filmmakers such as Michael Moore are notorious for their libelous films which use faulty logic to advance their liberal agenda despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

Examples

Examples used by the Left

Liberals often criticize the following conservative documentaries:


References

  1. ↑ Michael Moore Issues Iraq Withdrawal Fatwa, By Noel Sheppard, American Thinker, December 04, 2006.
  2. ↑ Block That Schlock, TIME magazine, Nov. 23, 1959

See also