Difference between revisions of "Talk:Harvard abortion study"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(the ABC link)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
Wow. This article reaches levels of ridiculousness I thought were unobtainable. <font color="FFD700">[[User:ColinR|ColinR]]</font><sup><font color="000000">[[User_talk:ColinR|talk]]</font></sup> 12:54, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
+
(baseless attack deleted)
−
 
 
−
: Colin, I almost blocked your account for that remark.  This is a serious effort and I suggest you baseless attack before I have to.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:09, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
 
  
 
:Assuming you mean the original article reporting the study, I agree completely. Rarely have a seen a more blatant example of [[junk science]]. You can't exclude people who die of breast cancer, from a study on breast cancer! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 13:06, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:Assuming you mean the original article reporting the study, I agree completely. Rarely have a seen a more blatant example of [[junk science]]. You can't exclude people who die of breast cancer, from a study on breast cancer! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 13:06, 24 April 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 17:22, April 24, 2007

(baseless attack deleted)

Assuming you mean the original article reporting the study, I agree completely. Rarely have a seen a more blatant example of junk science. You can't exclude people who die of breast cancer, from a study on breast cancer! --Ed Poor 13:06, 24 April 2007 (EDT)

How about a link to the actual study so we can draw our own conclusions instead of reading Andy's slanted opinions? Jrssr5 13:08, 24 April 2007 (EDT)

Here's the NY Times's spin on it: [1] --Ed Poor 13:11, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
And here's an older NY Times story: [2] --Ed Poor 13:13, 24 April 2007 (EDT)