Difference between revisions of "Corroborating evidence"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(undeadend)
(→‎top: clean up & uniformity)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
'''Corroborating evidence''' is supplementary evidence that tends to strengthen or confirm the initial evidence in [[court]]. [[category:legal terms]]
+
'''Corroborating evidence''' is supplementary evidence that tends to strengthen or confirm the initial evidence in [[court]].  
 +
 
 +
'''Corroborating evidence''' is important where the facts of a case are disputed by two or more witnesses.  The side that can show their version of events is supported by other facts, will go a long way towards convincing a judge or jury that their version is more likely to be true. 
 +
 
 +
For example: Bob is alleged to have punched Richard, but Bob denies this.  Evidence that Bob later attended hospital with a damage to his wrist would tend to corroborate the fact the punch happened.  On the other hand, evidence that a few days later Bob was Best Man at Richards Wedding would tend to corroborate that Richard is lying about being punched. 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Legal Terms]]
 +
[[Category:Evidence]]

Latest revision as of 06:57, July 13, 2016

Corroborating evidence is supplementary evidence that tends to strengthen or confirm the initial evidence in court.

Corroborating evidence is important where the facts of a case are disputed by two or more witnesses. The side that can show their version of events is supported by other facts, will go a long way towards convincing a judge or jury that their version is more likely to be true.

For example: Bob is alleged to have punched Richard, but Bob denies this. Evidence that Bob later attended hospital with a damage to his wrist would tend to corroborate the fact the punch happened. On the other hand, evidence that a few days later Bob was Best Man at Richards Wedding would tend to corroborate that Richard is lying about being punched.