Difference between revisions of "Diamond v. Chakrabarty"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (fix cite) |
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) (→top: clean up & uniformity) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Patents are granted today for genetic material, though the [[ACLU]] challenged this practice with a lawsuit in 2009. | Patents are granted today for genetic material, though the [[ACLU]] challenged this practice with a lawsuit in 2009. | ||
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] | [[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] | ||
| − | [[ | + | [[Category:Patent law]] |
Revision as of 11:39, July 13, 2016
In Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303 (1980), the U.S. Supreme Court extended patent protection to new forms of life. The Court relied on the legislative history, noting that the drafters of 35 U.S.C. § 101 intended "to 'include anything under the sun that is made by man.'" Id. at 309 (quoting S. REP. NO. 1979, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. 5 (1952); and H.R. REP. NO. 1923, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. 6 (1952)).
Patents are granted today for genetic material, though the ACLU challenged this practice with a lawsuit in 2009.