Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Judicial Activism"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (DavidB4 moved page Category talk:Judicial activism to Category talk:Judicial Activism: Correcting name capitalization, per Manual of Style) |
(response to a very old question) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Is it just me? or are al these examples of Judicial activism... shall we say... leaning a certain way... It seems as if every time they rule in favor of Conservatives it's a darn fine ruling, but if they rule liberal... It's an activist judge... What's the deal? [[User:DrCB|Doctor CB]][[User_Talk:DrCB|<sup>The Doctor is In</sup>]] 22:45, 16 April 2008 (EDT) | Is it just me? or are al these examples of Judicial activism... shall we say... leaning a certain way... It seems as if every time they rule in favor of Conservatives it's a darn fine ruling, but if they rule liberal... It's an activist judge... What's the deal? [[User:DrCB|Doctor CB]][[User_Talk:DrCB|<sup>The Doctor is In</sup>]] 22:45, 16 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Being conservative is inherently the resistance to radical change, and the conservation of the principles already in place, which have worked so well. When a judge rules against conservative principles, they are also ruling against law, president, and culture. Instead of deciding what the law says, as s their job, they decide what the law ''should say'' (in their opinions) and rule based on their own preferences, rather than the law they are employed to uphold. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup><small>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</small></sup> 10:27, 28 July 2016 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 14:27, July 28, 2016
Just wondering
Is it just me? or are al these examples of Judicial activism... shall we say... leaning a certain way... It seems as if every time they rule in favor of Conservatives it's a darn fine ruling, but if they rule liberal... It's an activist judge... What's the deal? Doctor CBThe Doctor is In 22:45, 16 April 2008 (EDT)
- Being conservative is inherently the resistance to radical change, and the conservation of the principles already in place, which have worked so well. When a judge rules against conservative principles, they are also ruling against law, president, and culture. Instead of deciding what the law says, as s their job, they decide what the law should say (in their opinions) and rule based on their own preferences, rather than the law they are employed to uphold. --David B (TALK) 10:27, 28 July 2016 (EDT)