Difference between revisions of "Talk:Article V Convention"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Signed.)
(The supporters on the GOP platform committee of an Article V Convention -- who are also the supporters of the Convention of States -- did not expect it to lose big, as it did. Their financial backers are globalists, who are a type of)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==RINOs?==
 
==RINOs?==
 
Just making sure I understand this right.  Did RINOs try to inject the Convention of States into the Republican platform, only to have it overwhelmingly shut down? --Pious (talk) 01:39, 1 August 2016 (CDT)
 
Just making sure I understand this right.  Did RINOs try to inject the Convention of States into the Republican platform, only to have it overwhelmingly shut down? --Pious (talk) 01:39, 1 August 2016 (CDT)
 +
 +
:The supporters on the [[GOP]] platform committee of an [[Article V Convention]] -- who are also the supporters of the [[Convention of States]] -- did not expect it to lose big, as it did.  Their financial backers are [[globalist]]s, who are a type of [[RINO]] (or not even [[Republican]] at all).--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 11:34, 1 August 2016 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 15:34, August 1, 2016

RINOs?

Just making sure I understand this right. Did RINOs try to inject the Convention of States into the Republican platform, only to have it overwhelmingly shut down? --Pious (talk) 01:39, 1 August 2016 (CDT)

The supporters on the GOP platform committee of an Article V Convention -- who are also the supporters of the Convention of States -- did not expect it to lose big, as it did. Their financial backers are globalists, who are a type of RINO (or not even Republican at all).--Andy Schlafly (talk) 11:34, 1 August 2016 (EDT)