Difference between revisions of "Talk:Kyle Kulinkski's "best argument for atheism" video"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 2: Line 2:
 
:My guess is that even if he does a video on this that he won't really intellectually grapple with this issue, but instead dodge the issue. That is one of the reasons why the [[New Atheism]] movement eventually collapsed like a proverbial souffle. Kulinkski is a new atheist. Richard Dawkins said about New Atheism, "[O]ur struggle is not so much an intellectual struggle, as a political one: What are we going to do about it?”.
 
:My guess is that even if he does a video on this that he won't really intellectually grapple with this issue, but instead dodge the issue. That is one of the reasons why the [[New Atheism]] movement eventually collapsed like a proverbial souffle. Kulinkski is a new atheist. Richard Dawkins said about New Atheism, "[O]ur struggle is not so much an intellectual struggle, as a political one: What are we going to do about it?”.
  
−
:And this is one of the reasons why [[global atheism]] is shrinking in its global market share.  
+
:Atheists dodging issues is one of the reasons why [[global atheism]] is shrinking in its global market share.  
  
 
:I think Kulinsky is more a political person and not very intellectual. New Atheism was never fully embraced by intellectuals within philosophy. That is why New Atheism was merely a populist fad within atheism. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 08:07, 7 August 2016 (EDT)
 
:I think Kulinsky is more a political person and not very intellectual. New Atheism was never fully embraced by intellectuals within philosophy. That is why New Atheism was merely a populist fad within atheism. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 08:07, 7 August 2016 (EDT)

Revision as of 12:08, August 7, 2016

Nice challenge,I sent a copy to him to make sure he gets it.--SammiL (talk) 03:13, 7 August 2016 (EDT)

My guess is that even if he does a video on this that he won't really intellectually grapple with this issue, but instead dodge the issue. That is one of the reasons why the New Atheism movement eventually collapsed like a proverbial souffle. Kulinkski is a new atheist. Richard Dawkins said about New Atheism, "[O]ur struggle is not so much an intellectual struggle, as a political one: What are we going to do about it?”.
Atheists dodging issues is one of the reasons why global atheism is shrinking in its global market share.
I think Kulinsky is more a political person and not very intellectual. New Atheism was never fully embraced by intellectuals within philosophy. That is why New Atheism was merely a populist fad within atheism. Conservative (talk) 08:07, 7 August 2016 (EDT)