Difference between revisions of "Moore v. Gunnison Valley Hosp."

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎top: clean up & uniformity)
(→‎top: Category)
 
Line 5: Line 5:
 
[[Category:Tenth Circuit]]
 
[[Category:Tenth Circuit]]
 
[[Category:Judicial Immunity]]
 
[[Category:Judicial Immunity]]
−
[[Category:Peer review]]
+
[[Category:Peer Review]]

Latest revision as of 18:35, September 2, 2016

In Moore v. Gunnison Valley Hosp., 310 F.3d 1315 (10th Cir. 2002), the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit held that participants in peer review at a hospital were not entitled to the same absolute quasi-judicial immunity as enjoyed by participants in a medical board action against a physician.

The Court observed that "[t]here are no significant procedural safeguards" in peer review at a hospital. Moreover, there is a lack of "direct oversight by a government agency as well as a right to appeal to that agency." Instead, "there is very minimal and undefined oversight by the state medical board and no explicit right of appeal to that board."