Difference between revisions of "Talk:Alt-right"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(I can't find a source, new section)
 
(Great points. Please improve the entry as you think best)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== I can't find a source ==
 
== I can't find a source ==
 
" The alt-right accepts the study of evolution and global warming... " This is idiosyncrasy of the left. I don't see a source that confirms this. I think it's important to re-include Masculinity as a rejection of Feminism. Metrosexual, feminist beta males have zero support. Men being men, traditional male roles that built the West are lauded.--Jpatt 20:54, 10 October 2016 (EDT)
 
" The alt-right accepts the study of evolution and global warming... " This is idiosyncrasy of the left. I don't see a source that confirms this. I think it's important to re-include Masculinity as a rejection of Feminism. Metrosexual, feminist beta males have zero support. Men being men, traditional male roles that built the West are lauded.--Jpatt 20:54, 10 October 2016 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Great points.  Please improve the entry as you think best.  It had some nonsensical criticisms of alt-right in it and perhaps some good material was deleted as part of the cleanup effort.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 22:10, 10 October 2016 (EDT)

Revision as of 02:10, October 11, 2016

I can't find a source

" The alt-right accepts the study of evolution and global warming... " This is idiosyncrasy of the left. I don't see a source that confirms this. I think it's important to re-include Masculinity as a rejection of Feminism. Metrosexual, feminist beta males have zero support. Men being men, traditional male roles that built the West are lauded.--Jpatt 20:54, 10 October 2016 (EDT)

Great points. Please improve the entry as you think best. It had some nonsensical criticisms of alt-right in it and perhaps some good material was deleted as part of the cleanup effort.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 22:10, 10 October 2016 (EDT)