Difference between revisions of "Wikipedia police"
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) (clean up & uniformity) |
(®) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | The ''' | + | The '''Wikipedia® police''', or Wikipedia secret police, is a group of anonymous editors and administrators who quickly censor material that undermines the [[liberal]] and [[atheistic]] belief systems. This police has virtually no accountability to anyone and applies a complex set of rules in a completely one-sided manner. They almost never have user names reflecting their real names, and often operate under childish or anti-intellectual user names. |
As described by this observer on a [[Columbia University]] site on [[statistics]]:<ref>http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~cook/movabletype/archives/2006/09/who_writes_wiki.html</ref> | As described by this observer on a [[Columbia University]] site on [[statistics]]:<ref>http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~cook/movabletype/archives/2006/09/who_writes_wiki.html</ref> | ||
Latest revision as of 22:28, February 16, 2017
The Wikipedia® police, or Wikipedia secret police, is a group of anonymous editors and administrators who quickly censor material that undermines the liberal and atheistic belief systems. This police has virtually no accountability to anyone and applies a complex set of rules in a completely one-sided manner. They almost never have user names reflecting their real names, and often operate under childish or anti-intellectual user names.
As described by this observer on a Columbia University site on statistics:[1]
- So did the Gang of 500 [central Wikipedia participants] actually write Wikipedia? Wales decided to run a simple study to find out: he counted who made the most edits to the site ... it turns out over 50% of all the edits are done by just .7% of the users ... 524 people. ... And in fact the most active 2%, which is 1400 people, have done 73.4% of all the edits ....
On Feb. 18, 2008, a Conservapedia editor found flagrant bias in a Wikipedia entry concerning a textbook dispute over the theory of evolution. He corrected the bias, and predictably a Wikipedian reinserted the biased, incorrect material on Wikipedia within only eight hours.[2]
References
External links
- The Truths and Lies of WikiWorld Philip Coppens, Nexus Magazine, Accessed February 27, 2008