Difference between revisions of "Essay:Evolution and intelligent design"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (redo link)
m (Default Sort)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
[[Category:Essays]]The [[theory of evolution]] is merely a religion that serves to discredit the [[Intelligent Designer]] Himself. [http://www.allaboutscience.org/intelligent-design.htm]
+
The [[theory of evolution]] is merely a religion that serves to discredit the [[Intelligent Designer]] Himself. [http://www.allaboutscience.org/intelligent-design.htm]
  
 
[[Phillip E. Johnson]] told [[NOVA (PBS)|NOVA]]:  
 
[[Phillip E. Johnson]] told [[NOVA (PBS)|NOVA]]:  
Line 9: Line 9:
 
[[Category:Evolution]]
 
[[Category:Evolution]]
 
[[Category:Intelligent Design]]
 
[[Category:Intelligent Design]]
 +
[[Category:Essays]]
 +
{{DEFAULTSORT:Evolution and intelligent design}}

Revision as of 17:11, March 27, 2017

The theory of evolution is merely a religion that serves to discredit the Intelligent Designer Himself. [1]

Phillip E. Johnson told NOVA:

The theory of evolution may be true in a sense, but it may require the participation of an intelligent cause. That is the basic intelligent-design proposition—that unintelligent causes by themselves can't do the whole job. That doesn't say that everything was created all at once. [2]

See also