Difference between revisions of "Template:Critics of intelligent design"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(top: clean up & uniformity)
m (-move request)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude>{{move|Template:Critics of intelligent design}}</noinclude>
 
 
'''Critics of intelligent design''' are more comfortable attacking people than they are answering arguments.<ref>[http://www.evolutionnews.org/2012/06/when_you_cant_a061271.html David Klinghoffer ''"When You Can't Answer the Argument, Attack the Credentials of the Person Offering It"''], 22 Jun 2012</ref>
 
'''Critics of intelligent design''' are more comfortable attacking people than they are answering arguments.<ref>[http://www.evolutionnews.org/2012/06/when_you_cant_a061271.html David Klinghoffer ''"When You Can't Answer the Argument, Attack the Credentials of the Person Offering It"''], 22 Jun 2012</ref>
 
<noinclude>==References==
 
<noinclude>==References==

Latest revision as of 21:18, March 28, 2017

Critics of intelligent design are more comfortable attacking people than they are answering arguments.[1]

References

  1. David Klinghoffer "When You Can't Answer the Argument, Attack the Credentials of the Person Offering It", 22 Jun 2012