Difference between revisions of "User:Conservative/technology"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
*[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2017/03/modern-science-is-non-science.html Modern science is non-science] | *[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2017/03/modern-science-is-non-science.html Modern science is non-science] | ||
| + | *[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45R9uuww7u0 Quackery Crisis! Less than 1 percent of Scientific Journals Utilize Scientific Method] | ||
== Scientific community and science publications == | == Scientific community and science publications == | ||
Revision as of 23:43, April 2, 2017
Innovation
Innovation articles:
Changing face of workplace
Droids:
Robotics:
- Mish Shedrock on Robotics - Part I
- Mish Shedrock on Robotics - Part II
- Humans Need Not Apply
- Rising Robots: Is it Obvious Robots Cost Human Jobs? Looking for Someone to Blame
Robots and economic process of creative destruction:
Robots and repetitive jobs:
Problems with modern scientific community
- Modern science is non-science
- Quackery Crisis! Less than 1 percent of Scientific Journals Utilize Scientific Method
Scientific community and science publications
Social science literature has major problems
Military technology
SR-71 Blackbird:
- SR-71 Blackbird was so fast it outran every missile, Mig fighter jet encountered over enemy territory
- Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird Fastest Jet in the World
Apache helicopters and helicopter gunships:
Creation vs. evolution
"The one in 1068 is the probability of calling out each card — in order — as you turn them up. That’s the correct analogy between cards and evolution. It’s a certainty you will get a sequence. But is it the exact sequence you want? Correct math, wrong application. The probability is 1 you will get a sequence, but much less likely you could correctly call out each card as it’s dealt (This is also sometimes illustrated as a group of monkeys randomly typing out the works of Shakespeare)."[1]