Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Conservapedia's insights - or Andrew Schlafly's?: I may have helped to erase some embarrassing obvious ''basic'' errors in the translations, but I cannot follow most of Andrew Schlafly's conclusions.
Line 452: Line 452:  
:They're personal insights, but Andy shares the insights with others using something called ''language''.  [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 00:20, 4 April 2017 (EDT)
 
:They're personal insights, but Andy shares the insights with others using something called ''language''.  [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 00:20, 4 April 2017 (EDT)
 
::Thanks, VargasMilan.  I say "Conservapedia's insights" because they developed on Conservapedia with the assistance of others, including even August!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 00:43, 4 April 2017 (EDT)
 
::Thanks, VargasMilan.  I say "Conservapedia's insights" because they developed on Conservapedia with the assistance of others, including even August!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 00:43, 4 April 2017 (EDT)
 +
:::President Obama shared his insights with us using language, too. That doesn't make them "American Insights". Is here engaged conservapedian but Andrew Schlafly - perhaps one of the sysops - who supports these insights? I may have helped to erase some embarrassing obvious ''basic'' errors in the translations,  but I cannot follow most of Andrew Schlafly's conclusions. Anyone?--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 11:52, 4 April 2017 (EDT)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023

edits

Navigation menu