| Line 442: |
Line 442: |
| | {{reflist}} | | {{reflist}} |
| | | | |
| − | == Conservapedia's insights - or Andrew Schlafly's? == | + | == Conservapedia's insights == |
| | | | |
| | Over the years, Andrew Schlafly came up with some insights about the Bible, which are now aggregated at [[Best Conservapedia insights about the Bible]]. These are introduced as | | Over the years, Andrew Schlafly came up with some insights about the Bible, which are now aggregated at [[Best Conservapedia insights about the Bible]]. These are introduced as |
| Line 470: |
Line 470: |
| | :Mr. Schlafly, I appreciate the info. I'll do some more study on the matter when I get the chance. I think this is the first time I've heard it challenged, so it is somewhat surprising to hear that so many people question it. I'll do some reading on the matter when I find the time. What I don't quite understand is, why do liberal like to cite it? Because it implies sin is okay? Because it suggests Jesus is not offended by transgression? Thanks! --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 22:34, 5 April 2017 (EDT) | | :Mr. Schlafly, I appreciate the info. I'll do some more study on the matter when I get the chance. I think this is the first time I've heard it challenged, so it is somewhat surprising to hear that so many people question it. I'll do some reading on the matter when I find the time. What I don't quite understand is, why do liberal like to cite it? Because it implies sin is okay? Because it suggests Jesus is not offended by transgression? Thanks! --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 22:34, 5 April 2017 (EDT) |
| | ::Also, regarding adultery not being punishable by death, am I mistaken, or was that the penalty under levitical law? Even though the Romans were the only ones who could ''legally'' pronounce the death sentence, it could be claimed that the Jews were so engaged that they were going to do it anyway. Of course, I have no idea if this is actually the case, but it is a possible explanation. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 00:48, 6 April 2017 (EDT) | | ::Also, regarding adultery not being punishable by death, am I mistaken, or was that the penalty under levitical law? Even though the Romans were the only ones who could ''legally'' pronounce the death sentence, it could be claimed that the Jews were so engaged that they were going to do it anyway. Of course, I have no idea if this is actually the case, but it is a possible explanation. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 00:48, 6 April 2017 (EDT) |
| | + | |
| | + | :::It's all explained in the entry [[Essay:Adulteress Story]]. Adultery was punishable by death, but not stoning. Liberals love the story because says sinners cannot punish anyone, and certainly never the [[death penalty]]. Also, the story says no one even has to ask for forgiveness!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 01:11, 6 April 2017 (EDT) |
| | | | |
| | == Please check fake news article == | | == Please check fake news article == |
| | | | |
| | I and JDano have differing opinions of how the article [[Fake News]] should be organized and what information it should include and where. I request that other editors give their opinion. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 16:45, 5 April 2017 (EDT) | | I and JDano have differing opinions of how the article [[Fake News]] should be organized and what information it should include and where. I request that other editors give their opinion. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 16:45, 5 April 2017 (EDT) |