Changes

→‎Conservapedia's insights: Who were these phony time-travelling liberals?
Line 472: Line 472:     
:::It's all explained in the entry [[Essay:Adulteress Story]].  Adultery was punishable by death, but not by stoning.  Liberals love the story because says sinners cannot punish anyone, and certainly never the [[death penalty]].  Also, the story says no one even has to ask for forgiveness!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 01:11, 6 April 2017 (EDT)
 
:::It's all explained in the entry [[Essay:Adulteress Story]].  Adultery was punishable by death, but not by stoning.  Liberals love the story because says sinners cannot punish anyone, and certainly never the [[death penalty]].  Also, the story says no one even has to ask for forgiveness!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 01:11, 6 April 2017 (EDT)
 +
 +
Andy, you write: "The adulteress story is a phony insertion by liberals" Who were these phony time-travelling  liberals who inserted the story before the 4th century? --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 02:55, 6 April 2017 (EDT)
    
== Please check fake news article ==
 
== Please check fake news article ==
    
I and JDano have differing opinions of how the article [[Fake News]] should be organized and what information it should include and where. I request that other editors give their opinion. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 16:45, 5 April 2017 (EDT)
 
I and JDano have differing opinions of how the article [[Fake News]] should be organized and what information it should include and where. I request that other editors give their opinion. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 16:45, 5 April 2017 (EDT)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023

edits