| | According to [[Conservapedia:Topic bans]], "If an editor is a new editor and has not built up a reputation of quality edits, the topic ban may be imposed quickly if the low quality of his edit/edits merits it." Also, "Editors who receive topic bans may incur them due to their article edits and/or their talk page edits." Also, "For example, such an editor may be asked to refrain from editing political/religious/history articles or various other kinds of articles." Also, "Also, if the matter merely requires an editor to be better educated about a topic, the editor in question may be asked to create an article in draft space. If the draft article is of sufficient quality, it will be moved to Conservapedia article space." | | According to [[Conservapedia:Topic bans]], "If an editor is a new editor and has not built up a reputation of quality edits, the topic ban may be imposed quickly if the low quality of his edit/edits merits it." Also, "Editors who receive topic bans may incur them due to their article edits and/or their talk page edits." Also, "For example, such an editor may be asked to refrain from editing political/religious/history articles or various other kinds of articles." Also, "Also, if the matter merely requires an editor to be better educated about a topic, the editor in question may be asked to create an article in draft space. If the draft article is of sufficient quality, it will be moved to Conservapedia article space." |
| − | So a new liberal editor who nearly always post liberal tripe to talk pages, can immediately be given a draft page writing assignment or can be told he can only post to non-ideological articles. Since promotion of the liberal narrative is all-important to hard core leftists, this immediately shuts them down. | + | So a new liberal editor who nearly always post liberal tripe to talk pages, can immediately be given a draft page writing assignment or can be told he can only post to non-ideological articles. Since promotion of the leftist narrative is all-important to hard core leftists, this immediately shuts them down. |
| | For example, a militant leftist joins Conservapedia. He can immediately be assigned to create a draft article. For example, [[User: Hardcoreleftist/Soviet historical revisionism]] or [[User: Hardcoreleftist/Decline of the secular left in the 21st century]]. And if the articles are of good quality, they can be moved to article space. For example, the aforementioned draft articles could be move to [[Soviet historical revisionism]] and [[Decline of the secular left in the 21st century]]. The possibilities are endless! | | For example, a militant leftist joins Conservapedia. He can immediately be assigned to create a draft article. For example, [[User: Hardcoreleftist/Soviet historical revisionism]] or [[User: Hardcoreleftist/Decline of the secular left in the 21st century]]. And if the articles are of good quality, they can be moved to article space. For example, the aforementioned draft articles could be move to [[Soviet historical revisionism]] and [[Decline of the secular left in the 21st century]]. The possibilities are endless! |
| | In short, the topic ban is a conservative iron fist in a velvet glove approach to handling hard core leftist ideologues! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 06:53, 6 May 2017 (EDT) | | In short, the topic ban is a conservative iron fist in a velvet glove approach to handling hard core leftist ideologues! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 06:53, 6 May 2017 (EDT) |