Difference between revisions of "Talk:Obama war crimes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(response) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
: The situation is like Iran-Contra. While no weapons were sold to Iran til 1985, no one asked the obvious question: What funded the Contras from 1981-1985? [[Mena Arkansas]] and the Clinton's got a free pass. In fact, the "Iran-Contra" investigation itself was the cover-up of fact the CIA was importing narcotics into the United States. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''The coup plotters won, for now'']]</sup> 01:24, 9 May 2017 (EDT) | : The situation is like Iran-Contra. While no weapons were sold to Iran til 1985, no one asked the obvious question: What funded the Contras from 1981-1985? [[Mena Arkansas]] and the Clinton's got a free pass. In fact, the "Iran-Contra" investigation itself was the cover-up of fact the CIA was importing narcotics into the United States. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''The coup plotters won, for now'']]</sup> 01:24, 9 May 2017 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::Thank you for your response. However the question remains if the general public has adopted using the -gate suffix here? What is Arabic for "-gate"? [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 09:57, 10 May 2017 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 13:57, May 10, 2017
I honestly don't believe that "Benghazigate" is a widely used-term. It would probably be better if the page were moved to "Benghazi Scandal timeline". Ninety percent of Americans cannot spell Benghazi correctly, so hoping that they can manage Benghazigate is expecting too much. Use of the -gate suffix has some limits. Not every controversy or misconduct is comparable to Watergate. Do you have many sources using "Benghazigate?" JDano (talk) 23:12, 8 May 2017 (EDT)
- Benghazi scandal IMO relates to the Benghazi massacre, which in actuality covered up (a) illegal weapons sales, (b) illegal weapons transfers to the Islamic State, (c) misuse of intelligence agencies, domestic spying and harassment of reporters investigating the scandals, and (d) my conjecture that much of the CIA/Obama (basically Brennan, Obama, and a few others) harassment of Trump & assoc was to cover up their criminal (under both federal & international law) activities when Trump starting speaking openly that Obama & Hillary created ISIS (Jan. 2016). And Trump hired Flynn who was eyewitness to many abuses (Obama himself came out today again besmirching Flynn's reputation.
- Trump-Russia, I'm beginning to believe, was invented to cover Obama, Brennan, and Hillary's tracks (others too) in what, for a better name, is Benghazigate that killed tens, if not hundreds of thousands, and led to the European migrant crisis.
- In light of what's being uncovered, the deaths of four Americans shouldn't be confused with the larger abuses of power and fundamental damage these war criminals caused. RobSThe coup plotters won, for now 23:36, 8 May 2017 (EDT)
- See, here's the fundamental problem: while Amb. Stevens has been made the hero, basically to derail Hillary's ambition, Stevens was up to eyes in the transfer of Stinger missiles to the Islamic State. That',s why he was there. That's why he was appointed 2 years earlier. So is John McCain tainted by the scandal, as well. Other Republicans, too.
- The situation is like Iran-Contra. While no weapons were sold to Iran til 1985, no one asked the obvious question: What funded the Contras from 1981-1985? Mena Arkansas and the Clinton's got a free pass. In fact, the "Iran-Contra" investigation itself was the cover-up of fact the CIA was importing narcotics into the United States. RobSThe coup plotters won, for now 01:24, 9 May 2017 (EDT)