Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
4 bytes removed ,  02:15, May 18, 2017
m
no edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:  
{{main|Logical positivism}}
 
{{main|Logical positivism}}
   −
This razor was formulated by Mike Alder and is better known by its correct name, '''Newton's flaming laser sword'''. It says that whatever cannot be settled by experimentation is not worth debate.<ref>This statement itself cannot be tested by experimentation, likely making it an example of [[hypocrisy]].</ref>
+
This razor was formulated by Mike Alder and is better known by its correct name, '''Newton's flaming laser sword'''. It says that whatever cannot be settled by experimentation is not worth debate.<ref>This statement itself cannot be tested by experimentation, making it an example of [[hypocrisy]].</ref>
    
===Crabtree's bludgeon===
 
===Crabtree's bludgeon===
Line 31: Line 31:  
{{cquote|As a principle of parsimony, conversational implications are to be preferred over semantic context for linguistic explanations.|||Grice, we think?<ref>https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/implicature/</ref>}}
 
{{cquote|As a principle of parsimony, conversational implications are to be preferred over semantic context for linguistic explanations.|||Grice, we think?<ref>https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/implicature/</ref>}}
   −
Basically, when in a conversation, prefer what the speaker meant over what the sentence he/she spoke literally meant.
+
Basically, when in a conversation, prefer what the speaker meant over what the sentence he or she spoke literally meant.
    
===Hume's razor===
 
===Hume's razor===
SkipCaptcha
232

edits

Navigation menu