Talk:Obama's "green" jobs initiative

Guy: Why remove evidence of a successful program. Even Trump likes it.--GinnyS (talk) 22:21, 28 July 2017 (EDT)

I didn't remove it. I changed the placement and some of the wording to make it more concise. We don't need a section header for this info, and we don't need wordy in-your-face language showing that a program opposed by conservatives was a financial success (as of Nov. 2014). This is a conservative encyclopedia, and we are not going to parade the financial success of such a program as of nearly three years ago (as if that's all that matters about it). Either get in line or get out. --1990'sguy (talk) 22:26, 28 July 2017 (EDT)

You removed the part about the program success. Why? Wordy? In your face? Get a grip. The program is a continuing success even though conservatives opposed it. Does this mean loaning money to stimulate the economy is no longer a conservative virtue? Is this a case of liberal success and triumph? --GinnyS (talk) 22:42, 28 July 2017 (EDT)

I did not remove any part of the program's success. Look at the edit. Maybe you didn't look closely at the edit and missed that I combined two paragraphs into one while keeping the content and refs. If you really disagree with this, bring it to Andy and try to convince him. If not, then stop arguing. --1990'sguy (talk) 22:45, 28 July 2017 (EDT)

The word ‘Success’ is no longer in the article. Under Obama’s direction, this program was an unqualified success. Why is it so hard for conservatives to understand the idea that Obama had some good ideas? --GinnyS (talk) 23:06, 28 July 2017 (EDT)

See, you're adding content with a liberal point of view to the article -- you essentially just admitted it. Read the article Conservative. It explains what conservatism is. CP's point of view aligns with this article. If you still want to fight for your changes, which gives undue weight to your content, go to the talk page of the site's owner, User talk:Aschlafly, and try to convince him. --1990'sguy (talk) 23:10, 28 July 2017 (EDT)

And I thought I was implying Obama utilized some conservative ideas when governing America. You know, assisting private enterprise to stimulate the economy. Rather like Reagan. [1]--GinnyS (talk) 23:22, 28 July 2017 (EDT)

Just because Reagan did something does not mean it was a right decision -- citing Reagan is not a good strategy for liberals to use. But this is getting beside the point. I removed the undue weight of your edit by removing the header, and I made it more concise. We don't need to call it a "success" (a pov term) -- the statistics are enough. I already made clear to you where you should go if you want to appeal. --1990'sguy (talk) 23:26, 28 July 2017 (EDT)