Difference between revisions of "Free Exercise clause"
m (Reverted edits by Sh33naR (talk) to last revision by TheAmericanRedoubt) |
DavidB4-bot (Talk | contribs) m (→Further reading: HTTP --> HTTPS [#1], replaced: http://books.google.com → https://books.google.com (2)) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
This provision has been applied against the states also, thereby prohibiting some types of government interference with the exercise of religion. However, government interference is permitted under some circumstances. For example, In ''Employment Division v. Smith'' (1990), the [[Supreme Court]] ruled that using illegal drugs in a religious ceremony is illegal. | This provision has been applied against the states also, thereby prohibiting some types of government interference with the exercise of religion. However, government interference is permitted under some circumstances. For example, In ''Employment Division v. Smith'' (1990), the [[Supreme Court]] ruled that using illegal drugs in a religious ceremony is illegal. | ||
| − | In recent years conservative majorities on the Supreme Court have used Free Exercise to permit religious activities in public places, such as schools, that liberals want to ban using the [[Establishment clause]]. The line is that religious activities sponsored by the government or public schools are not allowed, but religious activities sponsored by private citizens using public facilities are allowed. Furthermore the government is not allowed to discriminate against religious activities because of their religious content when such activities would otherwise be allowed. That is a student group with religious goals cannot be banned if an identical group with nonreligious goals is not banned. | + | In recent years conservative majorities on the Supreme Court have used Free Exercise to permit religious activities in public places, such as schools, that liberals want to ban using the [[Establishment clause]]. The line is that religious activities sponsored by the government or public schools are not allowed, but religious activities sponsored by private citizens using public facilities are allowed. Furthermore, the government is not allowed to discriminate against religious activities because of their religious content when such activities would otherwise be allowed. That is a student group with religious goals cannot be banned if an identical group with nonreligious goals is not banned. |
==Further reading== | ==Further reading== | ||
| − | * Cookson, Catharine. ''Encyclopedia of religious freedom'' (2003) 553pp; [ | + | * Cookson, Catharine. ''Encyclopedia of religious freedom'' (2003) 553pp; [https://books.google.com/books?id=R0PrjC1Ar7gC&dq=%22supreme+court%22+%22free+exercise%22&lr=&as_drrb_is=q&as_minm_is=0&as_miny_is=&as_maxm_is=0&as_maxy_is=&num=30&as_brr=0&as_pt=ALLTYPES excerpts and text search] |
| − | * Witte, John. '' Religion and the American constitutional experiment'' (2004) 322 pages [ | + | * Witte, John. '' Religion and the American constitutional experiment'' (2004) 322 pages [https://books.google.com/books?id=GmXC3SikME4C&dq=%22supreme+court%22+%22free+exercise%22&lr=&as_drrb_is=q&as_minm_is=0&as_miny_is=&as_maxm_is=0&as_maxy_is=&num=30&as_brr=0&as_pt=ALLTYPES excerpt and text search] |
| − | == | + | ==See also== |
* [[Separation of Church and State]] | * [[Separation of Church and State]] | ||
* [[Establishment clause]] | * [[Establishment clause]] | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
* [[Lemon v. Kurtzman]] | * [[Lemon v. Kurtzman]] | ||
| − | ==== | + | ====References==== |
<references/> | <references/> | ||
Latest revision as of 16:45, September 26, 2018
The Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution states that:
- "Congress shall make no law ... prohibiting the free exercise" of religion.
This provision has been applied against the states also, thereby prohibiting some types of government interference with the exercise of religion. However, government interference is permitted under some circumstances. For example, In Employment Division v. Smith (1990), the Supreme Court ruled that using illegal drugs in a religious ceremony is illegal.
In recent years conservative majorities on the Supreme Court have used Free Exercise to permit religious activities in public places, such as schools, that liberals want to ban using the Establishment clause. The line is that religious activities sponsored by the government or public schools are not allowed, but religious activities sponsored by private citizens using public facilities are allowed. Furthermore, the government is not allowed to discriminate against religious activities because of their religious content when such activities would otherwise be allowed. That is a student group with religious goals cannot be banned if an identical group with nonreligious goals is not banned.
Further reading
- Cookson, Catharine. Encyclopedia of religious freedom (2003) 553pp; excerpts and text search
- Witte, John. Religion and the American constitutional experiment (2004) 322 pages excerpt and text search
