Difference between revisions of "Economic growth"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
−
'''Economic growth''' is an increase in a nation's capacity to produce [[goods]] and services over time. It is usually calculated using a country's gross domestic product (GDP) as compared to the country's population.<ref>Bjork, Gordon J. (1999). The Way It Worked and Why It Won’t: Structural Change and the Slowdown of U.S. Economic Growth. Westport, CT; London: Praeger. pp. 2, 67. ISBN 0-275-96532-5</ref><ref>http://usinfo.state.gov/products/pubs/oecon/chap12.htm</ref>
+
'''Economic growth''', or '''expansion''' is an increase in a nation's capacity to produce [[goods]] and services over time. It is usually calculated using a country's gross domestic product (GDP) as compared to the country's population.<ref>Bjork, Gordon J. (1999). The Way It Worked and Why It Won’t: Structural Change and the Slowdown of U.S. Economic Growth. Westport, CT; London: Praeger. pp. 2, 67. ISBN 0-275-96532-5</ref><ref>http://usinfo.state.gov/products/pubs/oecon/chap12.htm</ref>
  
 
Ideally, GDP annual growth should be 4% or more, as it was in the early 1950s and late 1980s, when the Nation benefited from [[Reaganomics]].  However, during the [[Obama Administration]] GDP never exceeded 2% annually.
 
Ideally, GDP annual growth should be 4% or more, as it was in the early 1950s and late 1980s, when the Nation benefited from [[Reaganomics]].  However, during the [[Obama Administration]] GDP never exceeded 2% annually.

Revision as of 12:34, December 13, 2018

Economic growth, or expansion is an increase in a nation's capacity to produce goods and services over time. It is usually calculated using a country's gross domestic product (GDP) as compared to the country's population.[1][2]

Ideally, GDP annual growth should be 4% or more, as it was in the early 1950s and late 1980s, when the Nation benefited from Reaganomics. However, during the Obama Administration GDP never exceeded 2% annually.

A recession marks a period of "negative growth," or more precisely, a contracting or collapsing economy.

References

  1. ↑ Bjork, Gordon J. (1999). The Way It Worked and Why It Won’t: Structural Change and the Slowdown of U.S. Economic Growth. Westport, CT; London: Praeger. pp. 2, 67. ISBN 0-275-96532-5
  2. ↑ http://usinfo.state.gov/products/pubs/oecon/chap12.htm