Difference between revisions of "Debate:Listing the Earth's most pressing needs in urgent order of fixing"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(obscenity removed)
Line 21: Line 21:
 
1) Poverty (people with money tend not to go hungry). 2) Wider, deeper democracy in all countries. 3) Preventable disease. 4) Alternative energy sources. 5) Be generally nicer to each other. --[[User:Robledo|Robledo]] 10:52, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
 
1) Poverty (people with money tend not to go hungry). 2) Wider, deeper democracy in all countries. 3) Preventable disease. 4) Alternative energy sources. 5) Be generally nicer to each other. --[[User:Robledo|Robledo]] 10:52, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
  
−
(1) Homosexuality; (2) Lack of acceptance of Jesus Christ as the one Lord, our God and Saviour; (3) Buttsex; (4) Hippies; (5) People who don't like chocolate sprinkles (I had a hard time ordering 4 and 5); (6) Brown people.--[[User:mittromney|mittromney]] 4:52, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
+
(obscenity removed - keep it clean and comply with the [[rules]])--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:21, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
−
:*Is using the word buttsex really necessary on this site? --'''<font color="DarkGreen">Adrian</font><font color="Yellow">[[User talk:AdrianP|P]]</font>''' 21:08, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
1)  Wealth Distribution  2)  Global Warming  3)  UN given greater powers  4) Save as many species as possible  5) Gun control  [[User:50something|50something]]
 
−
 
 
−
::: What's wrong with wealth distribution?  Don't you want people to have incentives to work hard?  Global warming is a phantom.  Do I even have to go into the total and complete worthlessness of the UN?  Why would you want an organization that promotes fascism and homosexuality to be more powerful?  I may most strongly disagree with you on (4).  Who are you to think that some species deserve to live even though God obviously put them in a place where they are destined to die out?  Isn't that hubris of the worst kind?  "I think God did a bad job with this species and it's up to me to come in and make sure what should happen to it, should God's plan be brought to fruition, in fact does not?"  And then gun control: Let me guess, once we repeal the second amendment, we should just go ahead and get rid of the whole bill of rights?  I think the people at [wikipedia] would be more attuned to your baseless ramblings...  --[[User:mittromney|mittromney]] 4:57, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
::: You may choose to disagree with me over certain matters.  And I will disagree with you that 'Buttsex' is a global problem.  Or sprinkles.  Oh, and also, I'm of partial South American descent, so I take issue with your hate-ridden 6) as well as 1)  If you're not prepared to be serious in your own posting, don't expect much from me.  [[User:50something|50something]]
 
−
 
 
−
:::I don't even know how to respond to that.  My normal argumentative strategy is to take what you say and demonstrate how it's inconsistent, but if you're going to hate on chocolate sprinkles yet champion buttsex, it seems apparent that consistency is not something you value in argumentation.  Hey, that's fine, have your buttsex and ignore the sprinkles, see if I care.  [[User:mittromney|mittromney]]
 
−
 
 
−
::::Where do you think chocolate sprinkles ''come from''? Sheesh... [[User:Human|Human]] 21:00, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
:::I hardly think that my comment reflected an opinion that I was 'championing' buttsex.  I merely doubt that it's a huge problem for the Earth, which this article is about.  I doubt whether the Earth cares whether the penis goes in Port A or Port B.  I do however discourage your use of such a nasty epithet as 'buttsex'.  When I came to this site, I was filled with hope that I would not encounter phrases such as 'buttsex'.  But here you are, a looney right-winger, and all you can say is 'buttsex'.  And sprinkles?  Grow up.  This is one stupid site.  [[User:50something|50something]]
 
−
 
 
−
:1) Poverty 2) Democracy by choice, not war, in all countries. 3) Cure as many diseases as possible 4) Alternative energy sources [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 17:09, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
 

Revision as of 01:21, May 9, 2007

To save humanity, we should focus on the worst first. --jp 23:30, 5 May 2007 (EDT)

1) hunger 2) preventable disease 3) unsolved diseases like AIDS 4) natural resources 5) preventing war 6) poverty ..... 19) global warming 20) asteroid striking Earth.

1) overpopulation 2) preventing war 3) preventable disease 4) natural resource protection .... 19) maintaining American sovereignty over the world 20) asteroid striking Earth. My quick 0.02, arbitraged through the Euro. Human 00:19, 6 May 2007 (EDT)

1) totalitarianism/world government 2) global warming 3) pandemic risk 4) US national debt 5) genocide DanH 00:22, 6 May 2007 (EDT)

1) terrorism 2) Communism 3) genocide 4) Hunger/Poverty (not the government's job however)... 19) US national debt ..... 267) natural resources ..... 1,532) asteroid striking earth ..... 7,854,238) alien invasion 7,854,239) global warming. --CPAdmin1 00:31, 6 May 2007 (EDT)

1) preventing gay marriage 2) preventing abortion 3) putting the 10 commandments in schools 4) convincing the global scientific community that evolution is false 5) defeating terrorism indefinitely and continuously 6) stopping liberals 7) keeping guns 8) stopping socialised health care 9) preventing environmentalist lies from damaging America's economy 10) making the speed of light more scriptural 11) abolishing public education 12) promoting conservative facts

1) Rejection of God. Solve that one and the rest would fall into place. Philip J. Rayment 10:17, 6 May 2007 (EDT)

1)Prevent global warming, by finding alternative (read:wind, solar, hydrogen, and, if it ever appears, fusion) sources of energy. 2) Stop, and reverse, the deleterious effect that free trade and international repression has had on developing African and Asia countries. 3) Enshrine the UDHR, the effective culmination of 12,000 years of thought from various religions and philosophies, into national law throughout the world. Give the UN a credible way of enforcing this which is independent of various national interests. --Wikinterpretertalk?

Yikes, add mind control--jp 18:03, 6 May 2007 (EDT)

1) Poverty (people with money tend not to go hungry). 2) Wider, deeper democracy in all countries. 3) Preventable disease. 4) Alternative energy sources. 5) Be generally nicer to each other. --Robledo 10:52, 6 May 2007 (EDT)

(obscenity removed - keep it clean and comply with the rules)--Aschlafly 21:21, 8 May 2007 (EDT)

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Listing_the_Earth%27s_most_pressing_needs_in_urgent_order_of_fixing&oldid=150347"