Difference between revisions of "Empirical science"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (→‎top: HTTP --> HTTPS [#1], replaced: http://books.google.com → https://books.google.com)
m (→‎top: HTTP --> HTTPS #3, replaced: http://www.icr.org → https://www.icr.org)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
'''Empirical science''' is based on the [[scientific method]] that requires from the scientist to test a [[theory]] based on [[Scientific observation|observed]] or predicted facts. The scientist must formulate a theory or a [[hypothesis]] based on what has been observed, then design a test by which the theory may be verified as valid or not.<ref>{{cite web
 
'''Empirical science''' is based on the [[scientific method]] that requires from the scientist to test a [[theory]] based on [[Scientific observation|observed]] or predicted facts. The scientist must formulate a theory or a [[hypothesis]] based on what has been observed, then design a test by which the theory may be verified as valid or not.<ref>{{cite web
−
|url=http://www.icr.org/scientific-method/
+
|url=https://www.icr.org/scientific-method/
 
|title=Empirical Science Is Observable
 
|title=Empirical Science Is Observable
 
|publisher=the Institute for Creation Research
 
|publisher=the Institute for Creation Research

Latest revision as of 11:43, April 9, 2019

Empirical science is based on the scientific method that requires from the scientist to test a theory based on observed or predicted facts. The scientist must formulate a theory or a hypothesis based on what has been observed, then design a test by which the theory may be verified as valid or not.[1] Knowledge and data acquired in empirical science is based entirely on experience and repeatable observations. Modern science has empiricism as its philosophical foundation. If adherents of a theory or hypothesis continue believing it due to their worldview despite it cannot survive a confrontation with experience, then such attitude is usually referred to as faith in doctrinal commitment. For example, a faith in planned economy or in junk DNA have been proposed to fall into such category.[2][3]

See also

References

  1. ↑ Empirical Science Is Observable. the Institute for Creation Research.
  2. ↑ David Berlinski (2009). "Has Darwin met his match?", The Deniable Darwin. Seattle, USA: Discovery Institute Press (reprinted from Commentary February 1998 by permission), 308. ISBN 978-0-9790141-2-3. 
  3. ↑ Jonathan Wells (2011). The Myth of Junk DNA. Discovery Institute Press. ISBN 978-1-9365990-0-4.