Difference between revisions of "King v. Burwell"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) m (→top: HTTP --> HTTPS [#1], replaced: http://hotair.com → https://hotair.com) |
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) m (→SCOTUSCare: HTTP --> HTTPS #3, replaced: http://www.foxnews.com → https://www.foxnews.com) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==SCOTUSCare== | ==SCOTUSCare== | ||
| − | In his dissent of the case, Scalia coined the term ''SCOTUSCare.''<ref>{{cite web |url= | + | In his dissent of the case, Scalia coined the term ''SCOTUSCare.''<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/06/25/scalia-scathing-scotuscare-dissent/ |title=Scalia leads scathing dissent on ObamaCare ruling, dubs law 'SCOTUScare' |work=[[Fox News]] |date=June 25, 2015 }}</ref> |
==References== | ==References== | ||
Latest revision as of 16:19, April 9, 2019
King v. Burwell (2015), is a controversial United States Supreme Court case in which the Supreme Court upheld ObamaCare subsidies.[1]
Vote
The 6-3 ruling was as follows: The majority ruling was John Roberts, joined by Anthony Kennedy, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan.
The dissent was led by Antonin Scalia and was joined by Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito.
SCOTUSCare
In his dissent of the case, Scalia coined the term SCOTUSCare.[2]
References
- ↑ Breaking: SCOTUS upholds ObamaCare subsidies in King, 6-3. Hot Air (June 25, 2015).
- ↑ Scalia leads scathing dissent on ObamaCare ruling, dubs law 'SCOTUScare'. Fox News (June 25, 2015).