Difference between revisions of "Lamarckism"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Recent uptick of Lamarckian school of macroevolutionary pseuodoscience)
m (Recent uptick of Lamarckism school of evolutionary thought: HTTP --> HTTPS #3, replaced: http://creation.com → https://creation.com (2))
 
(20 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Lamarckian theory of evolution''' (also known as Larmarkism) was proposed by [[French]] [[biology|biologist]] [[Jean-Baptiste Lamarck]] (Jean-Baptiste Pierre Antoine de Monet, Chevalier de Lamarck)<ref name="answersingenesis">[http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/cfol/ch2-pangenesis.asp Pangenesis: use and disuse], site www.answersingenesis.org</ref>.  
+
'''Lamarckism''' (also known as Larmarkianism) is a school of [[evolution]]ary thought proposed by [[French]] [[biology|biologist]] [[Jean-Baptiste Lamarck]] (Jean-Baptiste Pierre Antoine de Monet, Chevalier de Lamarck).<ref name="answersingenesis">[http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/cfol/ch2-pangenesis.asp Pangenesis: use and disuse], site www.answersingenesis.org</ref>   
  
This was one of the first theories that tried to explain the diversity of life based on naturalistic forces; as a scientific theory, it made predictions, and the failure to make accurate predictions make it a falsified scientific theory<ref>[http://www.springerlink.com/content/x05n5w520g614xt1/ Can the theory of evolution be falsified?], article by Paul A. M. van Dongen and Jo M. H. Vossen</ref>,
+
This was one of the first theories that tried to explain the diversity of life based on naturalistic forces; as a scientific theory, it made predictions, and the failure to make accurate predictions make it a falsified scientific theory,<ref>[http://www.springerlink.com/content/x05n5w520g614xt1/ Can the theory of evolution be falsified?], article by Paul A. M. van Dongen and Jo M. H. Vossen</ref>
  
Lamarck proposed that [[organism]]s' efforts to [[adapt]] to the [[environment]] can be accumulated and passed on to their offspring. Species evolved when traits acquired during life were passed from one generation to the next. For example, the ancestor of the giraffe was a short-necked herbivor, whose ancestors slowly forced their necks to grow to reach higher and higher trees<ref name="answersingenesis" />.
+
Lamarck proposed that [[organism]]s' efforts to [[adapt]] to the [[environment]] can be accumulated and passed on to their offspring. Species evolved when traits acquired during life were passed from one generation to the next. For example, the ancestor of the giraffe was a short-necked herbivor, whose ancestors slowly forced their necks to grow to reach higher and higher trees.<ref name="answersingenesis" />
  
This is called, in biology, [[inheritance of acquired characteristics]]. Since no such inheritance has been observed since Lamarck proposed it, this theory was discarded, and replaced by Darwin's [[inheritance of inborn characteristics]], proposed 40 years after Lamarck<ref name="answersingenesis" />.
+
This is called, in biology, [[inheritance of acquired characteristics]].  
  
In his book [[The Origin of Species]], [[Charles Darwin|Darwin]] spoke favorably of the Lamarckian theory of evolution.  However since the publication of Darwin's theory of natural selection and because of the lack of evidence for Lamarckian evolution in macrobiology, most biologists today favor an update of the Darwinian theory of evolution as the explanation for how human was evolved.
+
In his book [[The Origin of Species]], [[Charles Darwin|Darwin]] spoke favorably of the Lamarckian theory of evolution.  However, since the publication of Darwin's theory of natural selection and because of the lack of evidence for Lamarckian evolution in macrobiology, most biologists today favor an update of the Darwinian theory of evolution as the explanation for how human was evolved.
  
Despite all proofs and evidences against Lamarckianism, this theory became the official scientific theory in the [[Soviet Union]], sponsored by russian agronomist [[Trofim Denisovitch Lisenko]], during the reigns of Stalin and Khruchtchev<ref name="lisenko">[http://www.triplov.com/sacarrao/lysenko.html O Caso Lisenko] by G.F. Sacarrão (in Portuguese)</ref><ref>[http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v12/i3/darwin.asp Darwin and the search for an evolutionary mechanism], site www.answersingenesis.org</ref>.
+
Despite all proofs and evidences against Lamarckianism, this theory became the official scientific theory in the [[Soviet Union]], sponsored by Russian agronomist [[Trofim Denisovitch Lisenko]], during the reigns of Stalin and Khruchtchev.<ref name="lisenko">[http://www.triplov.com/sacarrao/lysenko.html O Caso Lisenko] by G.F. Sacarrão (in Portuguese)</ref><ref>[http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v12/i3/darwin.asp Darwin and the search for an evolutionary mechanism], site www.answersingenesis.org</ref>
  
== Recent uptick of Lamarckian school of macroevolutionary pseuodoscience ==
+
== Recent uptick of Lamarckism school of evolutionary thought ==
  
As can be seen below, there has been an uptick in [[macroevolution]]ary Lamarckian [[pseudoscience]] due to [[microevolution]]ary processes related to Lamarckianism:  
+
As can be seen below, there has been an uptick in [[macroevolution]]ary Lamarckism [[pseudoscience]] due to observed [[microevolution]]ary processes/changes seen in organisms related to Lamarckism:  
  
*[http://creation.com/epigenetics-and-darwin Darwin’s Lamarckism vindicated?] by [[Creation Ministries International]]
+
*[https://creation.com/epigenetics-and-darwin Darwin’s Lamarckism vindicated?] by [[Creation Ministries International]]
*[http://creation.com/mutations-epigenetics-information Mutations, epigenetics and the question of information] by Creation Ministries International
+
*[https://creation.com/mutations-epigenetics-information Mutations, epigenetics and the question of information] by Creation Ministries International
*[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2014/08/lamarck-lives.html Lamarck lives!] by [[Vox Day]] (Anti-[[evolution]]), August 16, 2014
+
 
*[http://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/mar/19/evolution-darwin-natural-selection-genes-wrong Why everything you've been told about evolution is wrong] by Oliver Burkeman, ''The Guardian'', March 18, 2010 (pro-evolution)
+
However, due to intellectual inertia, the [[Schools and evolution|evolutionist indoctrination]] of students into [[Neo-Darwinism]] (also called the [[Modern evolutionary synthesis]]) and people's natural tendency to resist change, the neo-darwinian school of evolutionary thought is still dominant within the evolutionary biology community (see also: [[Paradigm|Paradigm shift]]). The weight of evidence still supports the biblical [[creation]] model (see also: [[Creation science]]). See also: [[Atheist indoctrination]]
*[http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22029461.700-mouse-memory-inheritance-may-revitalise-lamarckism.html Mouse memory inheritance may revitalise Lamarckism], New Scientist, December 4, 2013
+
  
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
Line 25: Line 24:
  
 
[[Category:Evolution]]
 
[[Category:Evolution]]
[[category:biology]]
+
[[Category:Biology]]

Latest revision as of 16:26, April 9, 2019

Lamarckism (also known as Larmarkianism) is a school of evolutionary thought proposed by French biologist Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (Jean-Baptiste Pierre Antoine de Monet, Chevalier de Lamarck).[1]

This was one of the first theories that tried to explain the diversity of life based on naturalistic forces; as a scientific theory, it made predictions, and the failure to make accurate predictions make it a falsified scientific theory,[2]

Lamarck proposed that organisms' efforts to adapt to the environment can be accumulated and passed on to their offspring. Species evolved when traits acquired during life were passed from one generation to the next. For example, the ancestor of the giraffe was a short-necked herbivor, whose ancestors slowly forced their necks to grow to reach higher and higher trees.[1]

This is called, in biology, inheritance of acquired characteristics.

In his book The Origin of Species, Darwin spoke favorably of the Lamarckian theory of evolution. However, since the publication of Darwin's theory of natural selection and because of the lack of evidence for Lamarckian evolution in macrobiology, most biologists today favor an update of the Darwinian theory of evolution as the explanation for how human was evolved.

Despite all proofs and evidences against Lamarckianism, this theory became the official scientific theory in the Soviet Union, sponsored by Russian agronomist Trofim Denisovitch Lisenko, during the reigns of Stalin and Khruchtchev.[3][4]

Recent uptick of Lamarckism school of evolutionary thought

As can be seen below, there has been an uptick in macroevolutionary Lamarckism pseudoscience due to observed microevolutionary processes/changes seen in organisms related to Lamarckism:

However, due to intellectual inertia, the evolutionist indoctrination of students into Neo-Darwinism (also called the Modern evolutionary synthesis) and people's natural tendency to resist change, the neo-darwinian school of evolutionary thought is still dominant within the evolutionary biology community (see also: Paradigm shift). The weight of evidence still supports the biblical creation model (see also: Creation science). See also: Atheist indoctrination

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Pangenesis: use and disuse, site www.answersingenesis.org
  2. Can the theory of evolution be falsified?, article by Paul A. M. van Dongen and Jo M. H. Vossen
  3. O Caso Lisenko by G.F. Sacarrão (in Portuguese)
  4. Darwin and the search for an evolutionary mechanism, site www.answersingenesis.org