Difference between revisions of "Online Protection and Enforcement of Digital Trade Act"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) (clean up & uniformity) |
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) m (→Resources: HTTP --> HTTPS #3, replaced: http://www.forbes.com → https://www.forbes.com) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Resources== | ==Resources== | ||
| − | *[ | + | *[https://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2011/12/27/the-open-act-is-flawed-but-still-better-than-sopa/ The OPEN Act is Flawed but Still Better than SOPA - Forbes] |
*[https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/12/open-act-good-bad-and-practice-participatory-government The OPEN Act: The Good, the Bad, and a Practice in Participatory Government | Electronic Frontier Foundation] | *[https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/12/open-act-good-bad-and-practice-participatory-government The OPEN Act: The Good, the Bad, and a Practice in Participatory Government | Electronic Frontier Foundation] | ||
*[http://mashable.com/2012/01/18/googles-alternative-to-sopa-open/ Google's Suggested Alternative to SOPA: OPEN] | *[http://mashable.com/2012/01/18/googles-alternative-to-sopa-open/ Google's Suggested Alternative to SOPA: OPEN] | ||
Latest revision as of 18:38, April 9, 2019
The OPEN Act is alternative offered by the saner US House Representatives as an alternative to the various E-PARASITE Acts spawned by Hollywood-funded Congresspersons. One of the most prominent forces behind the OPEN Act is the tech-savvy Representative Darrell Issa (R-CA). The OPEN Act promises to do what SOPA and PIPA supposedly set out to do (protect US citizen from fraudulent foreign products) without placing undo burdens on small businesses or granting vast censorship powers to the entertainment industries.
External links
- KeepTheWebOpen.com
- SOPA vs PIPA vs OPEN – KeepTheWebOpen.com