| Line 21: |
Line 21: |
| | <!--------------------------------------> | | <!--------------------------------------> |
| | <!-- LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS BELOW THIS LINE ----------------------------------------------- THANKS!--> | | <!-- LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS BELOW THIS LINE ----------------------------------------------- THANKS!--> |
| | + | [[File:A Merry Christmas neon.jpg|center|300px]] |
| | + | ---- |
| | + | |
| | | | |
| | == Look == | | == Look == |
| Line 122: |
Line 125: |
| | ==Spellcheck== | | ==Spellcheck== |
| | I noticed on another wiki that when editing an article, misspelled words were underlined by red, like in Microsoft Word. Is this part of the wiki software? If so, maybe it should be installed? I don't know if you know how, but please look into that. It would eliminate many mistakes in our articles. [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 22:09, 20 March 2009 (EDT) | | I noticed on another wiki that when editing an article, misspelled words were underlined by red, like in Microsoft Word. Is this part of the wiki software? If so, maybe it should be installed? I don't know if you know how, but please look into that. It would eliminate many mistakes in our articles. [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 22:09, 20 March 2009 (EDT) |
| | + | |
| | + | ==suggested searches== |
| | + | Hey Philip, you know how on Wikipedia when you begin to search it pulls down as list, and if you mistype something it comes up on the next page with "Were you looking for...." Do you know if those are features we could turn on here, or do they have to do with which version of MediaWiki is installed? [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 14:01, 9 June 2009 (EDT) |
| | + | |
| | + | == Page-blanking == |
| | + | |
| | + | A thought: would it be possible to make Capcha take effect when a page is blanked? Earlier today a malcontent started blanking pages en mass; I was reverting him/her, but since many of the pages contained external links I was slowed down by the Capcha system while the page-blanker remained blithely unaffected. The software must be able to spot page-blanking, because I seem to recall it gives an automatic edit summary 'removing all content from page'. Worth looking into?--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 18:27, 19 June 2009 (EDT) |
| | + | |
| | + | == Article Request == |
| | + | |
| | + | Just something that I wanted to ask...could you please take down that 'satire of atheism' picture on the Atheism article? Or unlock it so that I can take it out? It seems rude and biased, as well as being false in its statement. Or, add a 'satire of christianity' to the Christianity article. [[User:KnightOfTheNight|KnightOfTheNight]] 21:45, 11 July 2009 (EDT)KnightOfTheNight |
| | + | |
| | + | *You must be confused, Knight. This is a Christian wiki, a conservative and Christian encyclopedia. What atheists are displeased about, bothers us not at all, and we don't apologize for that. We don't try to be neutral at all, either, for that would mean ignoring facts and the truth. --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 00:12, 12 July 2009 (EDT) |
| | + | |
| | + | == User rights == |
| | + | |
| | + | Philip- |
| | + | My younger brother Mark just registered for the economics course homework under the name of MarkGB, and cannot edit. I noticed that you said in an edit summary that new users were having trouble editing. Can you give him the appropriate rights please? |
| | + | Thanks, Duncan |
| | + | |
| | + | == Stray HTML tags == |
| | + | |
| | + | Hi. I've just noticed that when you look at an old version of a page (eg [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bank_run&oldid=745983 this one], the header saying that it is an old version of a page contains some stray HTML tags. Is this a problem that can be fixed?--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 11:55, 18 January 2010 (EST) |
| | + | |
| | + | == Thanksgiving, 2010 == |
| | + | |
| | + | That looks much better! Don't eat too much, Phil! :D --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 18:20, 24 November 2010 (EST) |
| | + | |
| | + | == Double redirects == |
| | + | |
| | + | Hello. |
| | + | I was going to fix the double redirects and was able to get to two of them but the rest are locked to prevent editing. Most of them seem to be talk pages for various "essays". I wouldn't have bothered you but the person who did the locking has his talk page locked and I cannot figure out how to bring up this subject with the individual. |
| | + | Thank you and God bless. [[User:DevonJ|DevonJ]] 16:34, 1 February 2011 (EST) |
| | + | |
| | + | == Problem with the database? == |
| | + | |
| | + | Hi, you seem to be the tech guy of this wiki - I got your name via [[Help:Contents]]'s "handy list" of [[Special:ListUsers&group=bureaucrat|bureaucrats]]. My question: is there a problem with the database? At least two of my comments vanished without leaving any trace. The damage isn't great: I was able to reconstruct the [[User_talk:DouglasA#My_comments|longer comment]] from a draft which was still stored in my cache. But perhaps other users were afflicted by such glitches, too. I would really appreciate if you could have a look into it! Thanks, [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 09:54, 3 May 2011 (EDT) |
| | + | |
| | + | == Bible Translation Project == |
| | + | |
| | + | I am going to start a Bible Translation project for the Philippines. I would like to talk with some folks to learn some insights, especially "what we would do differently had we only known from the beginning...". |
| | + | |
| | + | My conservative views are very similar to many that I see. I would appreciate any advice, tips, ect. |
| | + | |
| | + | Thanks. |
| | + | |
| | + | [[User:TheYachtsman|TheYachtsman]] 5:30PM, 16 August 2011 (CDT) |
| | + | |
| | + | == Request for Admin assistance == |
| | + | |
| | + | To all senior admins and sysops. I am being repeatedly abused by user:conservative who, among other things, accuses me continuously of being an atheist simply because I point out some of the holes in his articles. See [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&curid=113357&diff=924642&oldid=924636 here for the latest accusation]. I have asked him numerous times to desist with his sneering name calling as I find it offensive to have my faith questioned and nothing is ever done. He state’s I am atheist because I don’t agree with some of his ridiculous contentions. In actual fact it isn’t even that I disagree with him it is that I point out his shoddy research, poor scholarship and his berating, insulting and sarcastic behaviour towards others. I am of the opinion now that he is purposely calling me names because he knows I don’t like it which is unchristian, impolite and, above all, insulting. Is anyone going to teach this man some manners? Has Conservapedia become a place where Conservative is allowed to behave this way without any warning or comeuppance but all other editors and warned and blocked for minor infractions. He is in continual violation of the commandments yet NOTHING is done whereas people like myself are always watching out to avoid being banned. Well, fine, ban me if you like. I probably will be after this posting and no doubt Conservative will cackle with glee at “winning” again. But laugh Conservative, you win nothing. I post this is full knowledge that I might be blocked banned and insulted by you in my absence and I have always remained polite and civil plus I can hold my head up high. Hopefully one of you will take a stand and insist on standards of civility. But I don’t hold out much hope. Thanks, many of you were kind, decent people whom I enjoyed working with and I pray for you. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 19:21, 5 October 2011 (EDT) |
| | + | |
| | + | == notification of time of Internal Server Error == |
| | + | |
| | + | At CDT 5:19-5:21 I kept encountering Internal Server Error with instruction to notify webmaster of time it happened and what I had done when it occurred. I had clicked a link from a Conservapedia article to external Bible text, and then could not get back to the Conservapedia article, not even from my Favorites list link. When I did get back to the main article, clicking on the particular part of the table of contents in the article to get to where I had been only produced another Internal Server Error. Clicking "back" arrow at top of page only produced either the same notification or the main article and the notification when I clicked the table of contents.<br>--[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] ([[User talk:Dataclarifier|talk]]) 06:30, 22 May 2018 (EDT) |