Difference between revisions of "Universe"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
The [[universe]] is everything there is in regards to material existence.
 
The [[universe]] is everything there is in regards to material existence.
  
−
Credible scientists believe that the universe formed approximately 14 billion years ago, and [[Big Bang Theory|has been expanding]] ever since, making the visible universe about 28 billion [[light year]]s across.   
+
Credible scientists believe that the universe formed approximately 14 billion years ago, and [[Big Bang Theory|has been expanding]] ever since, making the visible universe about 156 billion [[light year]]s across <ref>Universe Measured: We're 156 Billion Light-years Wide! <i>Space.com</i> [http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/mystery_monday_040524.html]</ref>.   
 +
The apparent paradox can be solved by the fact that although nothing travels faster than light, the expansion of space itself can exceed the [[speed of light]].
 +
Imagine ants sitting on an elastic rubber cord, the ants can't walk faster than, let's say 20cm/s, so normally they can't move faster than 40cm/s away from each other, but if you pull the cord the ants can move away from each other faster than 40cm/s, even if they're not even moving their legs.
  
−
Interestingly, modern scientific ideas about the nature of the universe hypothesize that for any location, it appears that that location is at the center of this expansion.
+
For any location, it appears that that location is at the center of the expansion of the universe.
−
This can be easily understood through the "balloon analogy": imagine you sit on a random spot on the balloon, when someone inflates the balloon you'll see the balloon expanding away from you, so it would seem you are at the center of the expansion.
+
This can be easily understood through the "balloon analogy": imagine you are a random spot on a spotted balloon, when someone inflates the balloon you'll see the spots moving away from you, so it would seem you are at the center of the expansion, furthermore the further away the spots are the faster they move away from you, this is also true for the universe: the more distant a galaxy is, the faster it moves away from us.
  
 
== Young Earth Creationism View ==
 
== Young Earth Creationism View ==
−
Young earth [[creationism|creationists]] scientists state that the [[First Law of Thermodynamics|first law of thermodynamics]] and [[Second law of thermodynamics|second law of thermodynamics]] argue against an eternal universe and they also claim that these laws point to the universe being supernaturally created. <ref>[http://godevidences.net/space/lawsofscience.php Evidences for God From Space&mdash;Laws of Science]</ref><ref>Thompson, Bert, [http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/2329 So Long, Eternal Universe; Hello Beginning, Hello End!], 2001 (Apologetics Press)</ref><ref>http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/AstroPhysicalSciences14.html</ref>  Also, these scientists assert the [[theory of evolution]] has had considerable influence on fields outside of biology and this includes the field of [[astronomy]]. <ref>http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3836</ref>  For example, it is common for astronomers to refer to the "evolution of the universe".<ref>http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v435/n7042/edsumm/e050602-01.html</ref> [[Young earth creationism|Young earth creationist]] scientists believe the evolutionary view has had a negative effect on science of astronomy and that [[Materialism|materialistic]] explanations of the the origins of various astronomical bodies are insufficient and counter evidence.<ref>http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/AstroPhysicalSciences.html</ref><ref>http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3836</ref> In addition, creationists often cite the secular scientific literature in order to make the case that materialist explanations of various astromical bodies are inadequate:
+
Young earth [[creationism|creationists]] scientists state that the [[First Law of Thermodynamics|first law of thermodynamics]] and [[Second law of thermodynamics|second law of thermodynamics]] argue against an eternal universe, mainstream scientists agree with this, and they also claim that these laws point to the universe being supernaturally created. <ref>[http://godevidences.net/space/lawsofscience.php Evidences for God From Space&mdash;Laws of Science]</ref><ref>Thompson, Bert, [http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/2329 So Long, Eternal Universe; Hello Beginning, Hello End!], 2001 (Apologetics Press)</ref><ref>http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/AstroPhysicalSciences14.html</ref>  Also, these scientists assert the [[theory of evolution]] has had considerable influence on fields outside of biology and this includes the field of [[astronomy]]. <ref>http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3836</ref>  For example, it is common for astronomers to refer to the "evolution of the universe".<ref>http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v435/n7042/edsumm/e050602-01.html</ref> [[Young earth creationism|Young earth creationist]] scientists believe the evolutionary view has had a negative effect on science of astronomy and that [[Materialism|materialistic]] explanations of the the origins of various astronomical bodies are insufficient and counter evidence.<ref>http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/AstroPhysicalSciences.html</ref><ref>http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3836</ref> In addition, creationists often cite the secular scientific literature in order to make the case that materialist explanations of various astromical bodies are inadequate:
  
  

Revision as of 15:50, May 10, 2007

The universe is everything there is in regards to material existence.

Credible scientists believe that the universe formed approximately 14 billion years ago, and has been expanding ever since, making the visible universe about 156 billion light years across [1]. The apparent paradox can be solved by the fact that although nothing travels faster than light, the expansion of space itself can exceed the speed of light. Imagine ants sitting on an elastic rubber cord, the ants can't walk faster than, let's say 20cm/s, so normally they can't move faster than 40cm/s away from each other, but if you pull the cord the ants can move away from each other faster than 40cm/s, even if they're not even moving their legs.

For any location, it appears that that location is at the center of the expansion of the universe. This can be easily understood through the "balloon analogy": imagine you are a random spot on a spotted balloon, when someone inflates the balloon you'll see the spots moving away from you, so it would seem you are at the center of the expansion, furthermore the further away the spots are the faster they move away from you, this is also true for the universe: the more distant a galaxy is, the faster it moves away from us.

Young Earth Creationism View

Young earth creationists scientists state that the first law of thermodynamics and second law of thermodynamics argue against an eternal universe, mainstream scientists agree with this, and they also claim that these laws point to the universe being supernaturally created. [2][3][4] Also, these scientists assert the theory of evolution has had considerable influence on fields outside of biology and this includes the field of astronomy. [5] For example, it is common for astronomers to refer to the "evolution of the universe".[6] Young earth creationist scientists believe the evolutionary view has had a negative effect on science of astronomy and that materialistic explanations of the the origins of various astronomical bodies are insufficient and counter evidence.[7][8] In addition, creationists often cite the secular scientific literature in order to make the case that materialist explanations of various astromical bodies are inadequate:


“...most every prediction by theorists about planetary formation has been wrong.” Scott Tremaine, as quoted by Richard A. Kerr, “Jupiters Like Our Own Await Planet Hunters,” Science, Vol. 295, 25 January 2002, p. 605.[9]


“We don’t understand how a single star forms, yet we want to understand how 10 billion stars form.” Carlos Frenk, as quoted by Robert Irion, “Surveys Scour the Cosmic Deep,” Science, Vol. 303, 19 March 2004, p. 1750. [10]


“We cannot even show convincingly how galaxies, stars, planets, and life arose in the present universe.” Michael Rowan-Robinson, “Review of the Accidental Universe,” New Scientist, Vol. 97, 20 January 1983, p. 186. [11]


Also, these scientists advance a number of reasons for the earth and universe being approximately 6,000 years old,[12][13][14] and raise a number of objections to claims of an extremely old age for the earth and the universe.[15][13][16] Young earth creationist scientists also contest the Big Bang Theory stating that it is scientifically unsound. [17] [18][19][20][21]

In regards to the question of how one can see starlight from millions of years of light years away, young earth creationists scientists commonly mention two things. First, these scientists assert that the Big Bang Theory has a star light-travel time problem and cite the work of Dr. Charles W. Misner. [22] Secondly, the work of young earth creationist scientist Dr. John Hartnett is cited.

John Hartnett theorizes that the Earth was trapped in a time-dilation field, caused by an extremely powerful gravitational field, during the first few days of creation. What appeared to be days on Earth would have been billions of years to the rest of the universe.

Hartnett attributes the creation and removal of the field, as well as the required stabilization of our solar system after the field's removal, to God himself. [23]

References

  1. ↑ Universe Measured: We're 156 Billion Light-years Wide! Space.com [1]
  2. ↑ Evidences for God From Space—Laws of Science
  3. ↑ Thompson, Bert, So Long, Eternal Universe; Hello Beginning, Hello End!, 2001 (Apologetics Press)
  4. ↑ http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/AstroPhysicalSciences14.html
  5. ↑ http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3836
  6. ↑ http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v435/n7042/edsumm/e050602-01.html
  7. ↑ http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/AstroPhysicalSciences.html
  8. ↑ http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3836
  9. ↑ http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/ReferencesandNotes43.html
  10. ↑ http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/ReferencesandNotes60.html
  11. ↑ http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/ReferencesandNotes61.html
  12. ↑ ‘Young’ age of the Earth & Universe Q&A (Answers in Genesis).
  13. ↑ 13.0 13.1 Astronomy and Astrophysics Questions and Answers (Answers in Genesis).
  14. ↑ ‘Young’ age of the Earth & Universe Q&A (Creation Ministries International).
  15. ↑ Radiometric Dating Questions and Answers (Answers in Genesis)
  16. ↑ http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/young.asp
  17. ↑ Thompson, Bert, Harrub, Brad, and May, Branyon The Big Bang Theory—A Scientific Critique Apologetics Press, May 2003 - 23[5]:32-34,36-47.
  18. ↑ Brown, Walt, 2001, Big Bang?
  19. ↑ http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/309
  20. ↑ http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/2047
  21. ↑ http://www.icr.org/article/343/
  22. ↑ http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v25/i4/lighttravel.asp
  23. ↑ http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v17/i2/cosmology.asp