Difference between revisions of "Talk:Big Pharma"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 1: Line 1:
−
I'm puzzled as to why this article does not take a more critical tone. Big Pharma is filled with a bunch of corrupt elitists, and it's killing people! Donald Trump has expended so much time and effort taking on Big Pharma, and populists on the left have also discussed lowering prescription drug prices, for example. But this article portrays Big Pharma as honourable people who have consistently ''saved'' lives. Could you please fix this article? Otherwise, I'm considering making another one, which is much more explicit about the horrible things Big Pharma has done and the need to counter their nefarious, corrupt actions. Jeez, I thought we could ''all'' agree that Big Pharma was bad...
+
I'm puzzled as to why this article does not take a more critical tone. Big Pharma is filled with a bunch of corrupt elitists, and it's killing people! Donald Trump has expended so much time and effort taking on Big Pharma, and populists on the left have also discussed lowering prescription drug prices, for example. But this article portrays Big Pharma as honourable people who have consistently ''saved'' lives. Could you please fix this article? Otherwise, I'm considering making another one, which is much more explicit about the horrible things Big Pharma has done and the need to counter their nefarious, corrupt actions. Jeez, I thought we could ''all'' agree that Big Pharma was bad... {{unsigned|BernieandTrumpFan}}
  
 
Please tag your username. [[User:BethGoop|BethGoop]] ([[User talk:BethGoop|talk]]) 16:36, 27 August 2019 (EDT)
 
Please tag your username. [[User:BethGoop|BethGoop]] ([[User talk:BethGoop|talk]]) 16:36, 27 August 2019 (EDT)
 +
 +
:The article doesn't defend Big Pharma either. It notes its role in passing ObamaCare. In general, it's usually a good idea to use encyclopedic language even when discussing topics that are bad, since we're a conservative *''encyclopedia''*.
 +
 +
:However, if you have some good examples (preferably using good sources) of the corruption and left-wing agenda of Big Pharma (which we know to be true), you are welcome to add them. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 16:40, 27 August 2019 (EDT)

Revision as of 20:40, August 27, 2019

I'm puzzled as to why this article does not take a more critical tone. Big Pharma is filled with a bunch of corrupt elitists, and it's killing people! Donald Trump has expended so much time and effort taking on Big Pharma, and populists on the left have also discussed lowering prescription drug prices, for example. But this article portrays Big Pharma as honourable people who have consistently saved lives. Could you please fix this article? Otherwise, I'm considering making another one, which is much more explicit about the horrible things Big Pharma has done and the need to counter their nefarious, corrupt actions. Jeez, I thought we could all agree that Big Pharma was bad... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by BernieandTrumpFan (talk)

Please tag your username. BethGoop (talk) 16:36, 27 August 2019 (EDT)

The article doesn't defend Big Pharma either. It notes its role in passing ObamaCare. In general, it's usually a good idea to use encyclopedic language even when discussing topics that are bad, since we're a conservative *encyclopedia*.
However, if you have some good examples (preferably using good sources) of the corruption and left-wing agenda of Big Pharma (which we know to be true), you are welcome to add them. --1990'sguy (talk) 16:40, 27 August 2019 (EDT)