Difference between revisions of "Ante-Nicene Fathers"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(statement re Ante-Nicene Fathers as subject of controversy within Christianity was followed only by statement of the contention of supporters. I added a balancing statement re view of critics and detractors, chiefly Protestants, anti-Catholics, liberals)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
The '''Ante-Nicene Fathers''' are those early Church fathers (and their associated writings) from the beginning of [[Christianity]] to the time of the creation of the [[Nicene Creed]] (the prefix "ante" means "before").  People in this category include [[Polycarp of Smyrna|Polycarp]], [[Tertullian]], [[Africanus|Julius Africanus]], [[Ignatius of Antioch|Ignatius]], [[Origen]], and [[Clement of Rome|Clement]].
 
The '''Ante-Nicene Fathers''' are those early Church fathers (and their associated writings) from the beginning of [[Christianity]] to the time of the creation of the [[Nicene Creed]] (the prefix "ante" means "before").  People in this category include [[Polycarp of Smyrna|Polycarp]], [[Tertullian]], [[Africanus|Julius Africanus]], [[Ignatius of Antioch|Ignatius]], [[Origen]], and [[Clement of Rome|Clement]].
  
−
The writings of the Ante-Nicene Fathers are the subject of controversy within Christianity. Supporters contend that the positions held by the Fathers represent Christian doctrine of the first centuries after the New Testament, and are thus presupposed by certain [[Christian apologetics|Christian apologists]] to be uncorrupted by later distortions and departures introduced by heretics and apostates.  When there was conflict about the truly catholic and orthodox interpretation of the Scriptures, theologians sought backing for their position in the writings of "the Fathers". By this they meant teachers of an earlier era who demonstrated how the apostolic scriptures were understood and applied by the apostles and their immediate successors.
+
The writings of the Ante-Nicene Fathers are the subject of controversy within Christianity.  
 +
 
 +
Supporters contend that the positions held by the Fathers represent Christian doctrine of the first centuries after the New Testament, and are thus presupposed by certain [[Christian apologetics|Christian apologists]] to be uncorrupted by later distortions and departures introduced by heretics and apostates.  When there was conflict about the truly catholic and orthodox interpretation of the Scriptures, theologians sought backing for their position in the writings of "the Fathers". By this they meant teachers of an earlier era who demonstrated how the apostolic scriptures were understood and applied by the apostles and their immediate successors.  
 +
 
 +
Critics and detractors, chiefly Protestants, anti-Catholics, Christian liberals and atheists contend that the positions held by the Fathers represent a radical corruption of pure Christian doctrine as evidence of the beginning of a Great Apostasy immediately after the death of the last Apostles and the completion of the New Testament, by [[syncretism]] with pagan Greek and Roman philosophies, and culminating in the 4th century invention of the pseudo-Christian-Pagan Catholic Church mandated by Roman Emperor [[Constantine]] at the [[Council of Nicaea]], immediately followed by the persecution of true Christians as heretics. Evidence of this corruption and apostasy is seen by Protestant and Fundamentalist apologists in the evident contrast of the "Catholic doctrines" in the Ante-Nicene Fathers with "the pure doctrines of New Testament Christianity rediscovered by the leaders of the [[Protestant Reformation]]."
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==

Revision as of 17:54, September 6, 2019

The Ante-Nicene Fathers are those early Church fathers (and their associated writings) from the beginning of Christianity to the time of the creation of the Nicene Creed (the prefix "ante" means "before"). People in this category include Polycarp, Tertullian, Julius Africanus, Ignatius, Origen, and Clement.

The writings of the Ante-Nicene Fathers are the subject of controversy within Christianity.

Supporters contend that the positions held by the Fathers represent Christian doctrine of the first centuries after the New Testament, and are thus presupposed by certain Christian apologists to be uncorrupted by later distortions and departures introduced by heretics and apostates. When there was conflict about the truly catholic and orthodox interpretation of the Scriptures, theologians sought backing for their position in the writings of "the Fathers". By this they meant teachers of an earlier era who demonstrated how the apostolic scriptures were understood and applied by the apostles and their immediate successors.

Critics and detractors, chiefly Protestants, anti-Catholics, Christian liberals and atheists contend that the positions held by the Fathers represent a radical corruption of pure Christian doctrine as evidence of the beginning of a Great Apostasy immediately after the death of the last Apostles and the completion of the New Testament, by syncretism with pagan Greek and Roman philosophies, and culminating in the 4th century invention of the pseudo-Christian-Pagan Catholic Church mandated by Roman Emperor Constantine at the Council of Nicaea, immediately followed by the persecution of true Christians as heretics. Evidence of this corruption and apostasy is seen by Protestant and Fundamentalist apologists in the evident contrast of the "Catholic doctrines" in the Ante-Nicene Fathers with "the pure doctrines of New Testament Christianity rediscovered by the leaders of the Protestant Reformation."

See also

External links

Retrieved from "https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ante-Nicene_Fathers&oldid=1561982"