Difference between revisions of "Talk:History of rugby"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Talk:Rugby moved to Talk:History of rugby: to make way for a new article which actually explains how rugby is played)
 
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
: Possibly the easiest way to do this would be by capitalising the names of the games, Rugby Union and Rugby League, as the latter is always referred to as Rugby League, or, more simply (and perhaps confusingly) as just 'League'. Thus one could have a League league. I'll make on or two edits - I think Stephen overstates the middle-classness of Union (it was played widely, for example, in the mining valleys of south Wales); and I'd say the south of England rather than south of Britain, as 'northern England' is mainly in the southern half of Great Britain. [[User:Alba|Alba]] 10:35, 12 May 2007 (EDT)
 
: Possibly the easiest way to do this would be by capitalising the names of the games, Rugby Union and Rugby League, as the latter is always referred to as Rugby League, or, more simply (and perhaps confusingly) as just 'League'. Thus one could have a League league. I'll make on or two edits - I think Stephen overstates the middle-classness of Union (it was played widely, for example, in the mining valleys of south Wales); and I'd say the south of England rather than south of Britain, as 'northern England' is mainly in the southern half of Great Britain. [[User:Alba|Alba]] 10:35, 12 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
:: I accept I oversimplify, it is to describe the difference and the history rather than to explain the current state of the games. To explain the difference in the sports now would be to go into the technicalities of the rules. I intend to feature South Wales later, as it is, as you suggest, significant. Excuse me if I am initially simplistic, it is just until I manage to write the many thousands of words necessary for a complete picture. [[user:stevendavy|stevendavy]]

Revision as of 23:02, May 12, 2007

We need to know what the rules of rugby are.

We also need to know the difference between the sports called "rugby league" and "rugby union". By the way, these are confusing terms for Americans, because "a rugby league" sounds like "a baseball league" and would denote a group of teams who compete against each other. --Ed Poor 10:24, 12 May 2007 (EDT)

Possibly the easiest way to do this would be by capitalising the names of the games, Rugby Union and Rugby League, as the latter is always referred to as Rugby League, or, more simply (and perhaps confusingly) as just 'League'. Thus one could have a League league. I'll make on or two edits - I think Stephen overstates the middle-classness of Union (it was played widely, for example, in the mining valleys of south Wales); and I'd say the south of England rather than south of Britain, as 'northern England' is mainly in the southern half of Great Britain. Alba 10:35, 12 May 2007 (EDT)
I accept I oversimplify, it is to describe the difference and the history rather than to explain the current state of the games. To explain the difference in the sports now would be to go into the technicalities of the rules. I intend to feature South Wales later, as it is, as you suggest, significant. Excuse me if I am initially simplistic, it is just until I manage to write the many thousands of words necessary for a complete picture. stevendavy