Difference between revisions of "Talk:No Child Left Behind"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: It's not just NEA criticism, if you look at the sources. If I include other sources, can we stick with 'educator criticism'? ~~~~)
 
(rather short on specifics)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
It's not just NEA criticism, if you look at the sources.  If I include other sources, can we stick with 'educator criticism'? [[User:Czolgolz|Czolgolz]] 12:42, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
 
It's not just NEA criticism, if you look at the sources.  If I include other sources, can we stick with 'educator criticism'? [[User:Czolgolz|Czolgolz]] 12:42, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
:Sure looks to me like the NEA's website, and it's rather short on specifics as to why NEA has trouble carrying out its job mandated by law.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:20, 14 May 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 17:20, May 14, 2007

It's not just NEA criticism, if you look at the sources. If I include other sources, can we stick with 'educator criticism'? Czolgolz 12:42, 14 May 2007 (EDT)

Sure looks to me like the NEA's website, and it's rather short on specifics as to why NEA has trouble carrying out its job mandated by law. RobS 13:20, 14 May 2007 (EDT)