Difference between revisions of "Single-party control"
m |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Single party control''' refers to the | + | '''Single party control''' refers to the virtual [[administration]] of [[government]] by one political party over another. It usually will lack [[bi-partisan]] and popular [[consensus]]. |
| − | Single-party control can arise through a temporary popular [[Supermajority]] by [[election]] | + | Single-party control can arise through: |
| + | *a temporary popular [[Supermajority]] by [[election]] | ||
| + | *by one party having such a large portion of the voter base that a candidate (once winning a primary, where applicable) is virtually guaranteed election (see [[safe seat]]), or | ||
| + | *through deliberate attacks on a [[nation]]'s [[law]]s by [[anti-democratic]] elements. | ||
[[Attorney General]] [[William Barr]] declared in a speech: | [[Attorney General]] [[William Barr]] declared in a speech: | ||
Revision as of 03:17, February 4, 2020
Single party control refers to the virtual administration of government by one political party over another. It usually will lack bi-partisan and popular consensus.
Single-party control can arise through:
- a temporary popular Supermajority by election
- by one party having such a large portion of the voter base that a candidate (once winning a primary, where applicable) is virtually guaranteed election (see safe seat), or
- through deliberate attacks on a nation's laws by anti-democratic elements.
Attorney General William Barr declared in a speech:
"In any age, the so-called progressives treat politics as their religion. Their holy mission is to use the coercive power of the State to remake man and society in their own image, according to an abstract ideal of perfection. Whatever means they use are therefore justified because, by definition, they are a virtuous people pursing a deific end. They are willing to use any means necessary to gain momentary advantage in achieving their end."[1]
The Marxist gospel of atheism leaves people without hope in this life or the next, hence politics because their reason for existence. This explains how progressives justify single party control and trampling on human rights, and the process of how totalitarian regimes come into existence. Single party advocates view dissenters and opposition as evil, standing in the way of "progress", people who must silenced, censored, or destroyed.