Difference between revisions of "Talk:Loch Ness Monster"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
Totnesmartin (talk | contribs) (→Article needs total re-work: agree) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
This article has no sourced claims, and gives way to much weight to theories that there really IS a creature. In desperate need of qualification and skepticism. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 16:01, 24 March 2007 (EDT) | This article has no sourced claims, and gives way to much weight to theories that there really IS a creature. In desperate need of qualification and skepticism. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 16:01, 24 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
:Agreed. Nessie exists as much as Sasquatch or the Abominable Snowman From what I've seen/read, Nessie was a hoax from day one. --[[User:Lohengrin|Lohengrin]] 16:27, 24 March 2007 (EDT) | :Agreed. Nessie exists as much as Sasquatch or the Abominable Snowman From what I've seen/read, Nessie was a hoax from day one. --[[User:Lohengrin|Lohengrin]] 16:27, 24 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::Although I personally believe in Nessie, I agree there's no direct proof, and the article should reflect that. [[User:Totnesmartin|Totnesmartin]] 15:15, 16 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 19:15, May 16, 2007
This statement need attributions if it is true. I personally doubt there has been a survey
It is considered by most to be a legendary hoax. Conservative 12:33, 22 March 2007 (EDT)conservative
TWO WORDS: "Tree fiddy" --Crackertalk 19:38, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
Article needs total re-work
This article has no sourced claims, and gives way to much weight to theories that there really IS a creature. In desperate need of qualification and skepticism. Tmtoulouse 16:01, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
- Agreed. Nessie exists as much as Sasquatch or the Abominable Snowman From what I've seen/read, Nessie was a hoax from day one. --Lohengrin 16:27, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
- Although I personally believe in Nessie, I agree there's no direct proof, and the article should reflect that. Totnesmartin 15:15, 16 May 2007 (EDT)