Difference between revisions of "Talk:Creationism"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Added material about Dover Trial)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Added material about Dover Trial ==
 
== Added material about Dover Trial ==
  
−
Here is what I added:  However, according the conservative source WorldNetDaily the judge in the ruling was far from impartial.  The WorldNetDaily wrote, "A historic judicial ruling against intelligent design theory hailed as a "broad, stinging rebuke" and a "masterpiece of wit, scholarship and clear thinking" actually was "cut and pasted" from a brief by ACLU lawyers and includes many of their provable errors, contends the Seattle-based Discovery Institute." [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53330] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 23:12, 24 February 2007 (EST)conservative
+
Here is what I added:  "However, the conservative publication WorldNetDaily wrote, "A historic judicial ruling against intelligent design theory hailed as a "broad, stinging rebuke" and a "masterpiece of wit, scholarship and clear thinking" actually was "cut and pasted" from a brief by [[ACLU]] lawyers and includes many of their provable errors, contends the Seattle-based Discovery Institute." [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53330] "

Revision as of 04:17, February 25, 2007

Added material about Dover Trial

Here is what I added: "However, the conservative publication WorldNetDaily wrote, "A historic judicial ruling against intelligent design theory hailed as a "broad, stinging rebuke" and a "masterpiece of wit, scholarship and clear thinking" actually was "cut and pasted" from a brief by ACLU lawyers and includes many of their provable errors, contends the Seattle-based Discovery Institute." [1] "