Difference between revisions of "Intelligent design"
m (British spelling corrected) |
(clarified criticism in first paragraph) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Intelligent Design is the theory that all biological complexity must derive from a non-human designer (such as [[God]]), rather than the | + | Intelligent Design is the theory that all biological complexity must derive from a non-human designer (such as [[God]]), rather than the random process of [[evolution]]. Critics often assert that it is Creationism-lite, in that it is a means of sneaking creationism into schools without overt religious implications. Proponents of intelligent design argue that the Designer need not ''necessarily'' be God, because that would make ID a religious theory that could not be taught in public schools until the United States once again has a Godly government. Instead, the Designer could also be, for example, a space alien with the power to create the universe. |
Proponents of Intelligent Design generally adopt the 'argument from incredulity'. They argue, essentially, that the complexity of living organisms is such that it could only come from an intelligent 'designer', without much justification other than their own inability to understand how evolution could create the same complexity. | Proponents of Intelligent Design generally adopt the 'argument from incredulity'. They argue, essentially, that the complexity of living organisms is such that it could only come from an intelligent 'designer', without much justification other than their own inability to understand how evolution could create the same complexity. | ||
Revision as of 15:52, February 25, 2007
Intelligent Design is the theory that all biological complexity must derive from a non-human designer (such as God), rather than the random process of evolution. Critics often assert that it is Creationism-lite, in that it is a means of sneaking creationism into schools without overt religious implications. Proponents of intelligent design argue that the Designer need not necessarily be God, because that would make ID a religious theory that could not be taught in public schools until the United States once again has a Godly government. Instead, the Designer could also be, for example, a space alien with the power to create the universe.
Proponents of Intelligent Design generally adopt the 'argument from incredulity'. They argue, essentially, that the complexity of living organisms is such that it could only come from an intelligent 'designer', without much justification other than their own inability to understand how evolution could create the same complexity.
The other major argument in the Intelligent Design arsenal is a variation of the incredulity argument, in that supporters frequently mischaracterize evolution as being a wholly random process, and that random processes. Intelligent Design proponents misunderstand, or at least seem to misunderstand, the effects of the iteration of natural selection in a particular environment over hundreds or thousands of generations.
The theory of Intelligent Design has little or no support outside the United States, because most other developed nations are too far down the path of un-Godliness and anti-Christianity. However, Intelligent Design is also very popular in Turkey, even though the Turks are Moslems.