Difference between revisions of "User talk:DanH"
m (rv) |
Conservative (talk | contribs) (notice) |
||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
I've come under attack for my edits on this article (there was even a call for me to be blocked from the site, though it's not on any CP talk pages) and I was trying to "balance" the article somehow. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 13:02, 17 May 2007 (EDT) | I've come under attack for my edits on this article (there was even a call for me to be blocked from the site, though it's not on any CP talk pages) and I was trying to "balance" the article somehow. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 13:02, 17 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == notice == | ||
| + | |||
| + | please read this: [[New Sysops Training Page]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:22, 17 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 01:22, May 18, 2007
Archives:
Vandalism
Dan,
Thanks for all your help dealing with this latest vandal. Rather than deleting all the pages he creates, I have been replacing them with content or redirecting them, and then protecting them. Eventually, we can hope he will run out of inventive names for Satan! ~ Sharon Talk 16:38, 11 May 2007 (EDT)
deletedpage
when pages need to be deleted and protected, just protect it and replace the content with #REDIRECT [[deletedpage]]. that way it doesn't show up on searches. --Tim (CPAdmin1)talk 12:24, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
Please take a look at this edit
You might want to have a look at this edit, and the associated photo that was uploaded to make the edit possible. I've already left a message with the user responsible for the photo and edit, but am not sure if it is revertable. HeartOfGold 18:41, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
Allegation of Racism
I fail to see how my comments on Sikhs are racist. Islam and Sikhism do not describe races they describe religion. Both are wrong in my opinion are to be condemed
Thank you indeed
It has been an honor. Thank you indeed.
--User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 19:42, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
Deceit Entry
Dan, please accept my apologies on the Ward Churchill edit to the deceit entry. I was confused about who he is. Feel free to reinsert something, with support like this: [1] --Aschlafly 22:08, 16 May 2007 (EDT) No need to apologize. I just figured that this instance was not quite conducive to the direct you had intended for this article. I'll re-add it a little later this evening. DanH 23:29, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
Hovind
May I ask why you removed "controversial". Given that many other YECs also have issues with him, calling him controversial seems fair. JoshuaZ 12:59, 17 May 2007 (EDT)
I've come under attack for my edits on this article (there was even a call for me to be blocked from the site, though it's not on any CP talk pages) and I was trying to "balance" the article somehow. DanH 13:02, 17 May 2007 (EDT)
notice
please read this: New Sysops Training Page
Conservative 21:22, 17 May 2007 (EDT)