Difference between revisions of "Class of one"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: "Class of one" is a legal argument under the Equal Protection Clause whereby a plaintiff prevails by proving that it "has been intentionally treated differently from others similarly ...)
(No difference)

Revision as of 23:01, May 21, 2007

"Class of one" is a legal argument under the Equal Protection Clause whereby a plaintiff prevails by proving that it "has been intentionally treated differently from others similarly situated and that there is no rational basis for the difference in treatment."[1]

Judge Michael McConnell has embraced a "class of one" argument in concurrence[2]

References

  1. ↑ Willowbrook v. Olech, 528 U.S. 562, 564 (2000).
  2. ↑ Christian Heritage Acad. v. Okla. Secondary Sch. Activities Ass'n, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 8186 (10th Cir. Apr. 9, 2007).
Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Class_of_one&oldid=171927"