Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,031
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 1,325:
Line 1,325: − + − + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Conservapedia:Community Portal (view source)
Revision as of 06:50, February 2, 2021
, 06:50, February 2, 2021Reverted edits by Karajou (talk) to last revision by RobSmith
I was looking at the [https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/conservapedia.com Alexa ranking] and statistics on this site and as I noticed the 'similar sites by audience overlap' statistic. I thought to myself, "I wonder if there are other good conservative sites out there," thinking that this would lead me to them. I was mistaken for one. When I saw 'Rationalwiki.org', I thought it would be another good conservative site like this one, hence 'rational', but it's swarming with liberals. I was a little annoyed at first, but some of their content funny, just because it's so wrong. As I was browsing the site, I came upon Conservapedia's article. Evidently, they have an extensive network of (mis)information about this site. If the liberals are going to write our history, I think the admins should create a page on this site detailing the history of Conservapedia from a conservative point of view. -[[User:Mark Adams|Mark Adams]][[User Talk:MAdams|(Discuss with me) ]] 10:33, 18 January 2021 (EST)
I was looking at the [https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/conservapedia.com Alexa ranking] and statistics on this site and as I noticed the 'similar sites by audience overlap' statistic. I thought to myself, "I wonder if there are other good conservative sites out there," thinking that this would lead me to them. I was mistaken for one. When I saw 'Rationalwiki.org', I thought it would be another good conservative site like this one, hence 'rational', but it's swarming with liberals. I was a little annoyed at first, but some of their content funny, just because it's so wrong. As I was browsing the site, I came upon Conservapedia's article. Evidently, they have an extensive network of (mis)information about this site. If the liberals are going to write our history, I think the admins should create a page on this site detailing the history of Conservapedia from a conservative point of view. -[[User:Mark Adams|Mark Adams]][[User Talk:MAdams|(Discuss with me) ]] 10:33, 18 January 2021 (EST)
==There will not be a kangaroo court here==
==Proposal==
This idea is nuts, and will never exist in this website. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 01:43, 2 February 2021 (EST)
I propose we establish a Conservapedia Project page for dispute resolution and editors to air their grievances against other editors, rather than clog up Andy's talk page. I propose we call it [[Conservapedia:Kangeroo Court]], unless somebody has a better name. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 21:32, 31 January 2021 (EST)
:Hmm, good idea. After all, then Andy won't have to deal with notifications about users posting on his talk page on arguments he appears to take no interest in involving himself in. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code><span style="color:black; background:#FFABAB">'''LT'''</span></code>]]'''''[[User:Liberaltears/mail|<sup>May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!</sup>]]''''' Monday, 12:25, 1 February 2021 (EST)
::If Andy wants to get involved in one of these peeing contests, there's nothing stopping him. This would encourage users to resolvd problems among themselves. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 14:15, 1 February 2021 (EST)
:::I think we should just stick to keeping Conservapedia simple. Having dispute resolution pages can end up being a mess, like it is on Wikipedia. [[User:Bytemsbu|Bytemsbu]] ([[User talk:Bytemsbu|talk]]) 21:05, 1 February 2021 (EST)
::::Every dispute doesn't' have to be resolved. The idea now is simply to keep trolls off Andy's talk page and give editors a place to air grievances, which may or may not be legit. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 21:17, 1 February 2021 (EST)
{{Warning collapse
|reason=Off topic; personal attack
|content=:::::You're starting again with the false accusations, Rob. You should've left well enough alone when Karajou removed this section and took that for the signal he was sending you, but now you're making like the proverbial "dog with a bone" that just won't drop it and let it go (especially now with your attempts to appeal to other editors here). [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 21:27, 1 February 2021 (EST)
::::::You're only continuing to prove my point (and Karajou's point) every time you do this, Rob. Ever since you decided to go rogue and bend a knee to the Biden regime with that post on my talk page falsely accusing me of "trolling" while leaving a link to that DHS note (which appears to have been the moment that you snapped), you've been getting progressively worse. The only reason you put that warning template up to hide what I have to say is because you don't like what I have to say, and only liberals resort to that kind of censorship for similar such reasons - and every time you do this, you only further prove that point. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 21:46, 1 February 2021 (EST)}}
:::The Kangaroo Court will reduce the incidence of divisive flame wars, giving aggrieved parties a place to vent their <s>spleens</s> differences. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 00:08, 2 February 2021 (EST)
No one is going to post on a forum with a title like the one proposed. This page is as good a place as any for the "Why is RobSmith so mean?" discussion. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 00:28, 2 February 2021 (EST)
:The objective is to establish a process where editors know they will be heard. Right now, Andy's talk page is the first and last resort for complaints and disputes. Some (probably if not most) are too trivial to deal with, which Andy doesn't have time to deal with. This leaves some editors frustrated for not getting resolution to their problems.
:A Kangaroo court will give all editors a chance to present their case with evidence before objective viewers. The viewers can then reject it without merit, or possibly render a decision one or both parties. The decision of course is without any enforcement mechanism, and blocking editors can cite as a second offense if the user doesn't mend their ways. Andy of course would be the Final Court of Appeal, but only after the Kangaroo Court rendered a decision.
:Sysops would be the only group of editors with direct access to making a complaint against a Sysop on Andy's talk page, by-passing the Kangaroo Court, and eliminating the frivolous cases we've seen in the past. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 01:04, 2 February 2021 (EST)
{{Warning collapse
|reason=DFTT
|content=:I'd like to let this drop and move on, but RobS is clearly unwilling to and he's letting it affect both his judgement and his ability to do his job. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 00:45, 2 February 2021 (EST)}}