User talk:SharonS

Welcome to SharonS's talk page. Please enter any messages you have for me below.

Thanks for your excellent correction to my lecture, Sharon! And thanks for all your other contributions!!!

By the way, 30 new users have joined Conservapedia recently, but they seem afraid to edit anything yet. That will change and I'm going to encourage them now with a message on the main page. --Aschlafly 18:42, 25 January 2007 (EST)

Sharon, please feel free to encourage the new users to contribute entries and edits, perhaps by welcoming them further on the main page. The new users seem to be reluctant and maybe they don't realize yet how easy it is to edit. Many of the new users are attracted by the lecture(s) on American history and I've added links to the lecture(s) for them to help fill in as a start.--Aschlafly 18:55, 25 January 2007 (EST)

Hey that sounds like a great idea. So how should we get started?--James G. 10:55, 14 February 2007 (EST)

I didn't remove useful information but instead removed fradulent information, and included a citation for the reason for the removal: Ben Franklin was a deist to his death. As it stands, the citation contradicts the information, so I again will remove the offending material but will leave the source in case you need to see why I did so. --Prometheus6289 20:21, 21 February 2007 (EST)

Sharon, your work continues to be tremendous. Feel free to block any vandals immediately. I just blocked the person who vandalized entry Jews.--Aschlafly 20:49, 21 February 2007 (EST)

You're right, Sharon! I blocked tmtm by mistake and now I can't figure out how to unblock him! Can you? (I know it's possible because Ben unblocked someone once.) I did mean to block the vandal of the George W. Bush page and will do that now.--Aschlafly 21:59, 21 February 2007 (EST)

Where you normally would go to block someone should be a link to an unblock form, click there and follow the instructions. JoshuaZ 22:03, 21 February 2007 (EST)

Thanks for the sysop designation. MountainDew 20:38, 25 February 2007 (EST)

Protection of pages

Dear Sharon,

In principle, I agree with you regarding protecting pages. However, with that being said I saw JoshuaZ unreasonably removing scholarly cautions regarding evolutionary ideas concerning planet formation. I believe he did that because he is unreasonable. Perhaps now that he has a higher profile in regards to supressing creationist criticisms he will stop doing it. I am not very hopeful regarding this matter based on my experiences with him at Wikipedia, however, although I would be pleasantly surprised if he does cease and desist. I wrote Aschafly about reconsidering his reversal of banning and I will see what his response is. With that being said I will try to temper my protecting of certain pages unless I see continued supression of creationist material. Conservative 15:34, 1 March 2007 (EST)conservative